Display options
Share it on

BMJ Open. 2012 May 25;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000918. Print 2012.

Impact of a pharmacist-prepared interim residential care medication administration chart on gaps in continuity of medication management after discharge from hospital to residential care: a prospective pre- and post-intervention study (MedGap Study).

BMJ open

Rohan A Elliott, Tim Tran, Simone E Taylor, Penelope A Harvey, Mary K Belfrage, Rhonda J Jennings, Jennifer L Marriott

Affiliations

  1. Pharmacy Department, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Australia.

PMID: 22637373 PMCID: PMC3367148 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000918

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To test the impact of a hospital pharmacist-prepared interim residential care medication administration chart (IRCMAC) on medication administration errors and use of locum medical services after discharge from hospital to residential care.

DESIGN: Prospective pre-intervention and post-intervention study.

SETTING: One major acute care hospital and one subacute aged-care hospital; 128 residential care facilities (RCF) in Victoria, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS: 428 patients (median age 84 years, IQR 79-88) discharged to a RCF from an inpatient ward over two 12-week periods.

INTERVENTION: Seven-day IRCMAC auto-populated with patient and medication data from the hospitals' pharmacy dispensing software, completed and signed by a hospital pharmacist and sent with the patient to the RCF.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary end points were the proportion of patients with one or more missed or significantly delayed (>50% of prescribed dose interval) medication doses, and the proportion of patients whose RCF medication chart was written by a locum doctor, in the 24 h after discharge. Secondary end points included RCF staff and general practitioners' opinions about the IRCMAC.

RESULTS: The number of patients who experienced one or more missed or delayed doses fell from 37/202 (18.3%) to 6/226 (2.7%) (difference in percentages 15.6%, 95% CI 9.5% to 21.9%, p<0.001). The number of patients whose RCF medication chart was written by a locum doctor fell from 66/202 (32.7%) to 25/226 (11.1%) (difference in percentages 21.6%, 95% CI 13.5% to 29.7%, p<0.001). For 189/226 (83.6%) discharges, RCF staff reported that the IRCMAC improved continuity of care; 31/35 (88.6%) general practitioners said that the IRCMAC reduced the urgency for them to attend the RCF and 35/35 (100%) said that IRCMACs should be provided for all patients discharged to a RCF.

CONCLUSIONS: A hospital pharmacist-prepared IRCMAC significantly reduced medication errors and use of locum medical services after discharge from hospital to residential care.

References

  1. J Qual Clin Pract. 2001 Dec;21(4):104-8 - PubMed
  2. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;2(4):257-64 - PubMed
  3. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):32-6 - PubMed
  4. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008 Feb;17(1):71-5 - PubMed
  5. Int J Qual Health Care. 2005 Feb;17(1):15-22 - PubMed
  6. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 May;24(5):630-5 - PubMed
  7. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003 Apr;51(4):549-55 - PubMed
  8. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008 Oct;6(4):205-11 - PubMed
  9. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 8;164(5):545-50 - PubMed
  10. Australas J Ageing. 2009 Dec;28(4):198-205 - PubMed
  11. Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Feb;18(1):22-7 - PubMed
  12. Arch Iran Med. 2009 Mar;12(2):173-5 - PubMed
  13. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jan;79(1):58-64 - PubMed
  14. Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;9(3):1090 - PubMed
  15. Australas J Ageing. 2012 Dec;31(4):247-54 - PubMed
  16. JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):831-41 - PubMed

Publication Types