Display options
Share it on

J Aging Res. 2012;2012:172957. doi: 10.1155/2012/172957. Epub 2012 May 14.

Intermuscular adipose tissue is muscle specific and associated with poor functional performance.

Journal of aging research

Lori J Tuttle, David R Sinacore, Michael J Mueller

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, Mail Code 0863, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

PMID: 22666591 PMCID: PMC3361226 DOI: 10.1155/2012/172957

Abstract

Purpose. People with obesity, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy have high levels of intermuscular adipose tissue (IMAT) volume which has been inversely related to physical function. We determined if IMAT is muscle specific, if calf IMAT is different between a healthy obese group (HO), a group with diabetes mellitus (D), and a group with diabetes mellitus and peripheral neuropathy (DN), and if IMAT volume or the ratio of IMAT/muscle volume is related to physical function in these groups. Methods. 10 healthy obese people, 11 with type 2 diabetes, 24 with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy, had assessments of muscle morphology, physical function and muscle performance. Results. The gastrocnemius muscle had a higher ratio of IMAT/muscle volume than any other muscle or compartment. There were no differences between groups in calf muscle or IMAT volumes. Calf IMAT was inversely related to physical performance on the 6-minute walk test (r = -0.47) and physical performance test (r = -0.36). IMAT/muscle volume was inversely related to physical performance (PPT, r = -0.44; 6 MW r = -0.48; stair power, r = -0.30). Conclusions. IMAT accumulation varies in calf muscles, is highest in the gastrocnemius muscle, and is associated with poor physical performance.

References

  1. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003 Jul 1;35(1):9-16 - PubMed
  2. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003 Aug;18(7):567-75 - PubMed
  3. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7 - PubMed
  4. Diabetologia. 1997 Sep;40(9):1062-9 - PubMed
  5. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 Jul;54(7):M353-6 - PubMed
  6. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Feb;74(2):165-9 - PubMed
  7. Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;294(11):1904-12 - PubMed
  8. Diabetes. 2006 Jun;55(6):1813-8 - PubMed
  9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000 Jul;81(7):960-5 - PubMed
  10. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 Apr;71(4):885-92 - PubMed
  11. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005 Apr;81(4):903-10 - PubMed
  12. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):748-54 - PubMed
  13. Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1336-44 - PubMed
  14. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1665-73 - PubMed
  15. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Feb;102(2):748-54 - PubMed
  16. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009 Oct;297(4):R1202-12 - PubMed
  17. Phys Ther. 1989 Oct;69(10):797-802 - PubMed
  18. Int J Sports Med. 2009 Oct;30(10):725-7 - PubMed
  19. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):874-80 - PubMed
  20. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011 Dec;34(6):1285-94 - PubMed
  21. Diabet Med. 1992 Jun;9(5):469-74 - PubMed
  22. Phys Ther. 2008 Nov;88(11):1345-54 - PubMed
  23. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Jun;55(6):M350-5 - PubMed
  24. Histochem J. 1975 May;7(3):259-66 - PubMed
  25. Diabetes Care. 2003 Feb;26(2):372-9 - PubMed
  26. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Oct 6;92(13):2270-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support