Display options
Cite
Dauber S, Neighbors C, Dasaro C, et al. Impact of Intensive Case Management on Child Welfare System Involvement for Substance-Dependent Parenting Women on Public Assistance. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012;34(7):1359-1366doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020.
Dauber, S., Neighbors, C., Dasaro, C., Riordan, A., & Morgenstern, J. (2012). Impact of Intensive Case Management on Child Welfare System Involvement for Substance-Dependent Parenting Women on Public Assistance. Children and youth services review, 34(7), 1359-1366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020
Dauber, Sarah, et al. "Impact of Intensive Case Management on Child Welfare System Involvement for Substance-Dependent Parenting Women on Public Assistance." Children and youth services review vol. 34,7 (2012): 1359-1366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020
Dauber S, Neighbors C, Dasaro C, Riordan A, Morgenstern J. Impact of Intensive Case Management on Child Welfare System Involvement for Substance-Dependent Parenting Women on Public Assistance. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012 Jul 01;34(7):1359-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PMID: 22661798; PMCID: PMC3363285.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Child Youth Serv Rev. 2012 Jul 01;34(7):1359-1366. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Impact of Intensive Case Management on Child Welfare System Involvement for Substance-Dependent Parenting Women on Public Assistance.

Children and youth services review

Sarah Dauber, Charles Neighbors, Chris Dasaro, Annette Riordan, Jon Morgenstern

Affiliations

  1. The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University.

PMID: 22661798 PMCID: PMC3363285 DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.03.020

Abstract

This study examined the impact of intensive case management (ICM) on decreasing child welfare system involvement in a sample of substance-dependent parenting women who participated in a welfare demonstration study comparing ICM to usual screen-and-refer models employed in welfare settings. Previous research established the effectiveness of ICM in both increasing engagement in substance abuse treatment and in promoting abstinence, and the current study tested whether ICM had downstream impacts on child welfare outcomes not directly targeted by the intervention. The sample included 302 mothers recruited from welfare offices and their 888 minor children. Child welfare outcomes were available from administrative records for four years following study entry and included incident reports and out-of-home child placements. An initial positive effect of ICM was found on child placements, but its impact lessened over time and was likely due to the increased contact with case managers that occurred early in the study. Overall, minimal benefits of ICM were found, suggesting that while ICM was effective in the areas of treatment engagement and abstinence, there were no downstream benefits for child welfare outcomes. Implications of findings in terms of increased need for cross-system collaboration are discussed.

References

  1. Addiction. 2003 May;98(5):673-84 - PubMed
  2. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1996 Aug;22(3):439-48 - PubMed
  3. J Subst Abuse. 1996;8(4):487-95 - PubMed
  4. Child Welfare. 2008;87(3):95-113 - PubMed
  5. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan-Mar;31(1):86-97 - PubMed
  6. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2001 Sep;21(2):97-103 - PubMed
  7. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2010 Jan;7(1):30-40 - PubMed
  8. Psychiatr Serv. 2004 Aug;55(8):913-22 - PubMed
  9. Addict Behav. 2000 Jan-Feb;25(1):123-9 - PubMed
  10. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1999 Jun 1;55(1-2):91-103 - PubMed
  11. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Apr;36(3):278-93 - PubMed
  12. Am J Public Health. 2009 Feb;99(2):328-33 - PubMed
  13. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992;9(3):199-213 - PubMed
  14. Child Maltreat. 2010 Aug;15(3):199-210 - PubMed
  15. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006 Mar;30(2):93-104 - PubMed
  16. Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30 - PubMed
  17. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Apr;22(3):161-8 - PubMed
  18. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1997 Jan-Mar;29(1):79-88 - PubMed
  19. Addiction. 2004 May;99(5):552-9 - PubMed
  20. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994 Aug;62(4):757-65 - PubMed
  21. Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Jan;60(1):56-60 - PubMed
  22. Child Welfare. 2003 May-Jun;82(3):335-65 - PubMed
  23. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996 Sep;42(1):49-54 - PubMed
  24. Care Manag J. 2002 Summer;3(4):172-7 - PubMed
  25. Child Maltreat. 2007 May;12(2):137-49 - PubMed
  26. Am J Public Health. 2006 Nov;96(11):2016-23 - PubMed
  27. Child Welfare. 2008;87(3):63-93 - PubMed
  28. Biometrics. 1988 Dec;44(4):1049-60 - PubMed
  29. Child Welfare. 2001 Jul-Aug;80(4):433-52 - PubMed
  30. Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Dec;38(14):1933-52 - PubMed
  31. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011 Mar 1;33(3):466-472 - PubMed
  32. Soc Work. 2000 Mar;45(2):131-40 - PubMed
  33. J Evid Based Soc Work. 2008;5(1-2):157-89 - PubMed
  34. Addiction. 2000 Aug;95(8):1237-47 - PubMed
  35. Health Serv Res. 2000 Jun;35(2):443-65 - PubMed
  36. Future Child. 2009 Fall;19(2):147-68 - PubMed
  37. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2000 Jul;70(3):316-26 - PubMed
  38. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Apr 1;94(1-3):172-82 - PubMed
  39. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;66(3):249-58 - PubMed
  40. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Apr;38(3):263-74 - PubMed
  41. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2007 Mar;39(1):81-95 - PubMed
  42. Soc Work Res. 2009 Sep;33(3):183-192 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support