Display options
Share it on

J Skin Cancer. 2012;2012:187963. doi: 10.1155/2012/187963. Epub 2012 Jul 16.

Comparing Melanoma Invasiveness in Dermatologist- versus Patient-Detected Lesions: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Journal of skin cancer

Cindy L Lamerson, Kristina Eaton, Joel L Sax, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet

Affiliations

  1. University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, NV 89557, USA.

PMID: 22848838 PMCID: PMC3405671 DOI: 10.1155/2012/187963

Abstract

This study examined whether patient-identified melanomas were more advanced than dermatologist-identified tumors at routine clinic visits, and whether a personal or family history of skin cancer was associated with patterns of detection. A retrospective chart review was performed on melanoma patients (N = 201) in a private dermatology clinic. Variables included age, gender, pattern of detection (i.e., patient or a board certified dermatologist), personal or family history of skin cancer, skin type, and previous sun exposure, as well as tumor location and severity. Dermatologist-diagnosed melanomas were less invasive (P < 0.0005), and more likely present on the chest, back, and legs (P < 0.01). Conversely, patient-identified lesions were more likely to occur on the face, neck and scalp, be associated with younger patients, and a family history of melanoma, but not other types of skin cancer (P < 0.01). In a post-hoc analysis examining these factors as predictors of tumor invasiveness, only diagnostic source was significant. Specifically, dermatologist-identified tumors were significantly less invasive than patient-identified tumors. Although age, family history, and tumor location played roles in the early detection of melanomas, the most important factor was diagnostic source. Thus, board-certified dermatologists play a key role in the early detection of malignant melanoma.

References

  1. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Jan;14(1):80-2 - PubMed
  2. Dermatol Online J. 2009 Nov 15;15(11):1 - PubMed
  3. Arch Dermatol. 2010 Mar;146(3):249-56 - PubMed
  4. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992 Jun;26(6):914-9 - PubMed
  5. Arch Dermatol. 2007 Apr;143(4):488-94 - PubMed
  6. Cancer. 2000 Jul 15;89(2):342-7 - PubMed
  7. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Sep;53(3):393-406 - PubMed
  8. Dermatology. 2002;205(2):127-30 - PubMed
  9. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998 May;38(5 Pt 1):669-80 - PubMed
  10. Arch Dermatol. 2009 Aug;145(8):873-6 - PubMed
  11. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2009 Jun;23(3):481-500, viii - PubMed
  12. Cancer. 2002 Jul 1;95(1):135-46 - PubMed
  13. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2010 Nov;10(11):1811-23 - PubMed
  14. Health Psychol. 1995 Mar;14(2):171-7 - PubMed
  15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996 Jan 3;88(1):17-23 - PubMed
  16. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Nov;65(5 Suppl 1):S17-25.e1-3 - PubMed
  17. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug 15;19(16):3622-34 - PubMed
  18. Cancer. 2002 Oct 1;95(7):1562-8 - PubMed
  19. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 Jan;54(1):105-14 - PubMed
  20. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Aug 15;19(16):3635-48 - PubMed
  21. JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):640-3 - PubMed
  22. Arch Dermatol. 2011 Nov;147(11):1269-75 - PubMed
  23. Arch Dermatol. 2003 May;139(5):607-12 - PubMed
  24. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006 May;54(5):783-92 - PubMed
  25. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 3;150(3):188-93 - PubMed

Publication Types