Display options
Share it on

Pol J Radiol. 2011 Jan;76(1):14-9.

Computed tomography perfusion examination is helpful in evaluating the extent of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer.

Polish journal of radiology

Agnieszka Trojanowska, Luiza Grzycka-Kowalczyk, Piotr Trojanowski, Janusz Klatka, Andrzej Drop

Affiliations

  1. 1 Department of General Radiology Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.

PMID: 22802811 PMCID: PMC3389912

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Squamous cell cancer (SCC) of the head and neck, like other malignancies, should be reported with regard to TNM classification and treated accordingly. Sole anatomic imaging has its drawbacks, as early lesion detection often remains challenging, non-neoplastic processes can mimic malignancies and there are doubts concerning the extent of tumour. The purpose of this study was to perform assessment of head and neck squamous cell cancer and surrounding tissue, in order to examine the relationship between perfusion measurements derived from CT perfusion imaging (CTP) and histologic evaluation of resected tissue.

MATERIAL/METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 21 primary SCC of the oral cavity and oropharynx, using contrast enhanced CT of the head and neck followed by CTP examination at the level of tumour. Blood flow (BF), blood volume (BV), mean transit time (MTT), and permeability (PS) values were calculated with use of manually drawn regions of interest (ROIs) over the lesions and on the contralateral side. Results were compared with histologic analysis of resected tissue.

RESULTS: CTP was possible in all twenty one patients, but one did not undergo surgery. Of the remaining twenty, four had retromolar trigone cancer, nine had tongue cancer and seven had tonsil cancer. We found significant differences between infiltrated and healthy tissue. Differentiation was most reliable by using blood flow (BF), permeability surface (PS) and blood volume (BV).

CONCLUSIONS: CTP shows promise in distinguishing benign and malignant processes, primarily by means of BF, BV and PS.

Keywords: CT perfusion; functional imaging; oropharyngeal cancer; squamous cell cancer

References

  1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Jan 21;328(3):184-94 - PubMed
  2. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Sep-Oct;27(5):687-93 - PubMed
  3. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008 Apr;83(4):489-501 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Cancer. 2002 Nov;38(16):2079-84 - PubMed
  5. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):960-71 - PubMed
  6. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994 Jul;120(7):699-702 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 2008 May 17;371(9625):1695-709 - PubMed
  8. JBR-BTR. 2007 Jul-Aug;90(4):264-7 - PubMed
  9. Head Neck. 1996 Jul-Aug;18(4):343-6 - PubMed
  10. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 May;26(5):1178-85 - PubMed
  11. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Apr 1;73(5):1313-8 - PubMed
  12. Radiology. 2009 May;251(2):422-8 - PubMed
  13. Radiother Oncol. 1999 Nov;53(2):105-11 - PubMed
  14. Invest Radiol. 2007 Mar;42(3):172-9 - PubMed
  15. Phys Med Biol. 2007 Oct 21;52(20):6181-96 - PubMed
  16. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Aug;29(7):1376-81 - PubMed
  17. Eur J Radiol. 1999 Jun;30(3):198-205 - PubMed
  18. Eur J Radiol. 2007 Nov;64(2):258-65 - PubMed
  19. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1326-31 - PubMed

Publication Types