Display options
Share it on

J Thorac Dis. 2012 Oct;4(5):467-73. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.09.05.

Results of the introduction of a minimally invasive esophagectomy program in a tertiary referral center.

Journal of thoracic disease

Rachel L G M Blom, Jean H G Klinkenbijl, Markus W Hollmann, Jacques J G H M Bergman, Miguel A Cuesta, Willem A Bemelman, Olivier R C Busch, M I van Berge Henegouwen

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands;

PMID: 23050110 PMCID: PMC3461068 DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2012.09.05

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy is accompanied by a high postoperative complication rate. Minimally invasive esophageal surgery appears to be a promising technique that might be associated with a lower pulmonary morbidity rate. The objective of this study was to describe the implementation of minimally invasive esophageal surgery in a tertiary referral center and to compare the results of our first series of minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIE) to conventional open esophagectomies.

METHODS: MIE was implemented after several procedures had been proctored by a surgeon with extensive experience with MIE. Preoperative characteristics and the postoperative course of patients who underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy were prospectively registered. Morbidity and overall hospital stay were compared between minimally invasive and open resections performed in the same period.

RESULTS: A total of 90 consecutive esophageal cancer patients underwent a transthoracic resection, 41 patients by means of a minimally invasive approach. Preoperative characteristics were comparable for both groups. The duration of surgery was longer in the MIE group (6.0 vs. 5.2 hours, P<0.001) and median blood loss was lower [100 vs. 500 mL (P<0.001)]. There was only a trend towards a shorter hospital stay in the MIE group (11 vs. 13 days, P=0.072), pulmonary complications occurred in 20% of patients in the MIE group vs. 31% in the open group (P=0.229). The overall complication rate was 51% in the MIE group vs. 63% in the open group, P=0.249.

CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of MIE in our center was successful and it appears to be a safe technique for patients with potentially curable esophageal carcinoma.

Keywords: Esophageal cancer; complications; surgical technical; thoracoscopy

References

  1. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):689-93 - PubMed
  2. N Engl J Med. 2002 Nov 21;347(21):1662-9 - PubMed
  3. Ann Surg. 2010 Aug;252(2):292-8 - PubMed
  4. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001 Jul;72(1):306-13 - PubMed
  5. Ann Surg. 2007 Feb;245(2):232-40 - PubMed
  6. Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):486-94; discussion 494-5 - PubMed
  7. Surg Endosc. 2010 Dec;24(12):3044-53 - PubMed
  8. Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1081-91 - PubMed
  9. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Mar;87(3):911-9 - PubMed
  10. Ann Surg. 2001 Mar;233(3):338-44 - PubMed
  11. J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Jul;203(1):7-16 - PubMed
  12. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1995 Feb;5(1):1-5 - PubMed
  13. BMC Surg. 2011 Jan 12;11:2 - PubMed
  14. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Jun;119(6):1126-32 - PubMed

Publication Types