Display options
Share it on

Asia Pac Fam Med. 2012 Aug 08;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1447-056X-11-6.

General Practitioners' responses to global climate change - lessons from clinical experience and the clinical method.

Asia Pacific family medicine

Grant Blashki, Alan Abelsohn, Robert Woollard, Neil Arya, Margot W Parkes, Paul Kendal, Erica Bell, R Warren Bell

Affiliations

  1. Nossal Institute for Global Health & The Melbourne Sustainable Society Institute, The University of Melbourne, 161 Barry St, Carlton, Melbourne, 3010, Australia. [email protected].

PMID: 22873633 PMCID: PMC3469365 DOI: 10.1186/1447-056X-11-6

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Climate change is a global public health problem that will require complex thinking if meaningful and effective solutions are to be achieved. In this conceptual paper we argue that GPs have much to bring to the issue of climate change from their wide-ranging clinical experience and from the principles underpinning their clinical methods. This experience and thinking calls forth particular contributions GPs can and should make to debate and action.

DISCUSSION: We contend that the privileged experience and GP way of thinking can make valuable contributions when applied to climate change solutions. These include a lifetime of experience, reflection and epistemological application to first doing no harm, managing uncertainty, the ability to make necessary decisions while possessing incomplete information, an appreciation of complex adaptive systems, maintenance of homeostasis, vigilance for unintended consequences, and an appreciation of the importance of transdisciplinarity and interprofessionalism.

SUMMARY: General practitioners have a long history of public health advocacy and in the case of climate change may bring a way of approaching complex human problems that could be applied to the dilemmas of climate change.

References

  1. Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Dec;36(12):1006-8 - PubMed
  2. Lancet. 2010 Nov 27;376(9755):1801-2 - PubMed
  3. BMJ. 2008 Jan 26;336(7637):191-4 - PubMed
  4. BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1094-8 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 May 25;107(21):9483-4 - PubMed
  6. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):609-13 - PubMed
  7. Ecohealth. 2011 Jun;8(2):137-9 - PubMed
  8. Aust Fam Physician. 2007 Dec;36(12):986-9 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2010 May 20;465(7296):342-5 - PubMed
  10. Int J Public Health. 2010 Apr;55(2):123-32 - PubMed
  11. Nature. 2003 Jan 2;421(6918):37-42 - PubMed
  12. Nature. 2010 May 20;465(7296):280-1 - PubMed
  13. Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1253-63 - PubMed
  14. Lancet. 2008 Apr 5;371(9619):1145-7 - PubMed
  15. Perspect Public Health. 2010 Jan;130(1):21-6 - PubMed
  16. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2012 May;17(2):211-24 - PubMed
  17. Nature. 2005 Nov 17;438(7066):303-9 - PubMed
  18. Science. 2010 Jun 18;328(5985):1500-1 - PubMed
  19. N Z Med J. 2011 Apr 29;124(1333):47-54 - PubMed
  20. BMJ. 2010 Nov 17;341:c6357 - PubMed
  21. CMAJ. 2008 Jul 1;179(1):54-5 - PubMed
  22. Arch Dis Child. 2010 Jul;95(7):545-9 - PubMed
  23. Q Rev Biol. 2010 Mar;85(1):27-55 - PubMed
  24. Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Aug;37(8):681-3 - PubMed
  25. BMJ. 2008 Jan 26;336(7637):165-6 - PubMed

Publication Types