Display options
Share it on

J Digit Imaging. 2013 Feb;26(1):5-9. doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9540-0.

Expanding the functionality of speech recognition in radiology: creating a real-time methodology for measurement and analysis of occupational stress and fatigue.

Journal of digital imaging

Bruce I Reiner

Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Veterans Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. [email protected]

PMID: 23053910 PMCID: PMC3553361 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9540-0

Abstract

While occupational stress and fatigue have been well described throughout medicine, the radiology community is particularly susceptible due to declining reimbursements, heightened demands for service deliverables, and increasing exam volume and complexity. The resulting occupational stress can be variable in nature and dependent upon a number of intrinsic and extrinsic stressors. Intrinsic stressors largely account for inter-radiologist stress variability and relate to unique attributes of the radiologist such as personality, emotional state, education/training, and experience. Extrinsic stressors may account for intra-radiologist stress variability and include cumulative workload and task complexity. The creation of personalized stress profiles creates a mechanism for accounting for both inter- and intra-radiologist stress variability, which is essential in creating customizable stress intervention strategies. One viable option for real-time occupational stress measurement is voice stress analysis, which can be directly implemented through existing speech recognition technology and has been proven to be effective in stress measurement and analysis outside of medicine. This technology operates by detecting stress in the acoustic properties of speech through a number of different variables including duration, glottis source factors, pitch distribution, spectral structure, and intensity. The correlation of these speech derived stress measures with outcomes data can be used to determine the user-specific inflection point at which stress becomes detrimental to clinical performance.

References

  1. J Digit Imaging. 2008 Dec;21(4):378-82 - PubMed
  2. Semin Roentgenol. 2003 Jul;38(3):231-43 - PubMed
  3. MedGenMed. 2001 Mar 05;3(2):2 - PubMed
  4. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Feb;25(1):3-6 - PubMed
  5. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Aug;25(4):445-8 - PubMed
  6. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Apr;25(2):201-5 - PubMed
  7. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 May;47(5):528-33 - PubMed
  8. BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5 - PubMed
  9. Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Sep;35(9):841-6 - PubMed
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1972 Oct;52(4):1238-50 - PubMed
  11. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008 Aug;191(2):321-7 - PubMed
  12. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007 May;4(5):313-9 - PubMed
  13. Nurs Res. 1976 Nov-Dec;25(6):440-6 - PubMed
  14. J Forensic Sci. 2001 Jan;46(1):63-7 - PubMed
  15. J Forensic Sci. 1980 Jan;25(1):174-88 - PubMed
  16. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010 Sep;7(9):698-704 - PubMed
  17. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Apr;73(4):1354-60 - PubMed
  18. J Am Coll Radiol. 2008 Apr;5(4):567-70 - PubMed
  19. JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1851-7 - PubMed
  20. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Jun;25(3):319-24 - PubMed
  21. J Digit Imaging. 2003 Dec;16(4):324-30 - PubMed
  22. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Feb;184(2):681-6 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types