Display options
Share it on

Adv Prev Med. 2012;2012:175694. doi: 10.1155/2012/175694. Epub 2012 Nov 20.

Factors that influence vaccination decision-making by parents who visit an anthroposophical child welfare center: a focus group study.

Advances in preventive medicine

Irene A Harmsen, Robert A C Ruiter, Theo G W Paulussen, Liesbeth Mollema, Gerjo Kok, Hester E de Melker

Affiliations

  1. Center for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), P.O. Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands ; Department of Work and Social Psychology, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.

PMID: 23209917 PMCID: PMC3508517 DOI: 10.1155/2012/175694

Abstract

In recent years, parents have become more disparaging towards childhood vaccination. One group that is critical about the National Immunization Program (NIP) and participates less comprises parents with an anthroposophical worldview. Despite the fact that various studies have identified anthroposophists as critical parents with lower vaccination coverage, no research has been done to explore the beliefs underlying their childhood vaccination decision-making. We conducted a qualitative study using three focus groups (n = 16) of parents who visit an anthroposophical child welfare center. Our findings show that participants did not refuse all vaccinations within the Dutch NIP, but mostly refused the Mumps, Measles, and Rubella (MMR) vaccination. Vaccination decisions are influenced by participants' lifestyle, perception of health, beliefs about childhood diseases, perceptions about the risks of diseases, perceptions about vaccine effectiveness and vaccine components, and trust in institutions. Parents indicated that they felt a need for more information. Sufficient references should be provided to sources containing more information about childhood vaccination, especially about the effectiveness of vaccines and vaccine components and the risks, such as possible side effects and benefits of vaccination. This may satisfy parents' information needs and enable them to make a sufficiently informed choice whether or not to vaccinate their child.

References

  1. Forsch Komplementmed. 2006;13 Suppl 2:7-18 - PubMed
  2. Vaccine. 2006 Nov 30;24(49-50):7030-6 - PubMed
  3. J Sch Health. 2005 Sep;75(7):276-80 - PubMed
  4. Soc Sci Med. 2006 Feb;62(3):628-42 - PubMed
  5. Vaccine. 2010 Jun 11;28(26):4235-48 - PubMed
  6. Health Educ Res. 1992 Sep;7(3):341-8 - PubMed
  7. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Nov 29;138(47-48):713-8 - PubMed
  8. Vaccine. 2006 May 15;24(20):4321-7 - PubMed
  9. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2001 Sep;55(9):685-6 - PubMed
  10. Arch Dis Child. 2002 Jul;87(1):22-5 - PubMed
  11. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 15;11:474 - PubMed
  12. Euro Surveill. 2009 Oct 08;14(40): - PubMed
  13. Health Psychol. 2007 Mar;26(2):136-45 - PubMed
  14. Lancet. 1999 May 1;353(9163):1485-8 - PubMed
  15. Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1532-41 - PubMed
  16. Euro Surveill. 2011 Apr 28;16(17): - PubMed
  17. Vaccine. 2006 Sep 11;24(37-39):6351-5 - PubMed
  18. Vaccine. 2005 May 2;23(24):3103-7 - PubMed
  19. Vaccine. 2006 Jan 30;24(5):644-51 - PubMed
  20. Public Health Rep. 2005 May-Jun;120(3):252-8 - PubMed
  21. Health Educ Q. 1987 Winter;14(4):411-48 - PubMed
  22. BMC Public Health. 2012 Feb 14;12:128 - PubMed
  23. Health Educ Res. 2008 Jun;23(3):499-511 - PubMed
  24. Euro Surveill. 2008 Jul 31;13(31): - PubMed
  25. Vaccine. 2012 May 28;30(25):3778-89 - PubMed
  26. BMC Public Health. 2011 Dec 20;11:943 - PubMed
  27. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Aug;29(2):105-12 - PubMed

Publication Types