Display options
Share it on

Indian J Pharm Sci. 2011 Nov;73(6):649-55. doi: 10.4103/0250-474X.100239.

Determination and estimation of pharmacokinetic profile of caffeine in form of extract of green tea leaves and its analogy with synthetic form.

Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences

Sangeetha Shanmugasundaram, N Manjunatha, R Vijayan, R B Khatwal, M K Samanta

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, JSS College of Pharmacy, Ooty-643 001, India.

PMID: 23112399 PMCID: PMC3480750 DOI: 10.4103/0250-474X.100239

Abstract

The aim of the study was to formulate and investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters for the tablets of herbal extract of caffeine with comparison to synthetic formulation. The tablets of the aqueous herbal extract of leaves of Camellia sinensis and synthetic caffeine were formulated by wet granulation technique. The HPLC and HPTLC were applied as analytical tools for estimation of caffeine. The batches of formulation (B1 to B7) were subjected for various pre and post-formulation studies. The pharmacokinetic of the batch B5 was assessed in rabbits, and the results were compared to synthetic batch B7. With the suitable pre and post-formulation results, the B5 showed in vitro release of 90.54% of caffeine at the end of 60 min. The release followed first order kinetics and the plot of Higuchi and Peppas confirms anomalous diffusion as the basic mechanism behind the release. B5 revealed non-significant mean C(max), t(1/2), and AUC of 1.88 μg/ml, 5.52 h and 9.67 μg.h/ml respectively compared to B7. The study highlights; no significant difference in the pharmacological effect of caffeine when administered in the form of extract. The administration of herbal extract can further provide the other health benefits lacked by synthetic caffeine.

Keywords: Camellia sinensis; pharmacokinetics; synthetic caffeine; tablets

References

  1. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 18;144(8):554-62 - PubMed
  2. Int J Pharm. 2004 May 4;275(1-2):279-83 - PubMed
  3. Int J Cardiol. 2006 Apr 14;108(3):301-8 - PubMed
  4. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;101(2):160-7 - PubMed
  5. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2007 Jan;51(1):116-34 - PubMed
  6. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Feb;123(2):459-65 - PubMed
  7. Nutr Rev. 1978 Apr;36(4):97-102 - PubMed
  8. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2001 Oct;16(7):523-531 - PubMed
  9. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2005 Apr 16;8(1):76-93 - PubMed
  10. Int J Pharm. 2006 Mar 9;310(1-2):90-100 - PubMed
  11. Life Sci. 2006 Mar 27;78(18):2073-80 - PubMed
  12. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;100(1):36-9 - PubMed
  13. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008 Dec 15;48(5):1321-5 - PubMed
  14. Phytomedicine. 2010 Jan;17(1):3-13 - PubMed
  15. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Jul;306(1):29-34 - PubMed
  16. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2003 Dec 15;4(4):E62 - PubMed
  17. Epidemiology. 2005 May;16(3):360-6 - PubMed
  18. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2006 Sep 22;7(3):78 - PubMed
  19. Atherosclerosis. 2000 Jan;148(1):67-73 - PubMed
  20. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2004 Nov 15;36(3):617-20 - PubMed
  21. Jpn J Cancer Res. 2000 Jul;91(7):686-91 - PubMed
  22. Food Chem Toxicol. 2002 Sep;40(9):1243-55 - PubMed
  23. Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1371-9 - PubMed
  24. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2006 Apr;19(2):119-24 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Pharmacol. 2004 Oct 1;500(1-3):177-85 - PubMed
  26. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1990;101(2):271-3 - PubMed
  27. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Jul 7;85(13):1038-49 - PubMed

Publication Types