J Clin Imaging Sci. 2012;2:58. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.101000. Epub 2012 Sep 25.

Accuracy of routine clinical ultrasound for staging of liver fibrosis.

Journal of clinical imaging science

Chih-Ching Choong, Sudhakar K Venkatesh, Edwin P Y Siew

PMID: 23230540 PMCID: PMC3515928 DOI: 10.4103/2156-7514.101000

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of routine clinical ultrasound in the staging of liver fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the ultrasound images of 156 patients with chronic viral hepatitis who underwent liver biopsy was performed. Two radiologists in consensus, blind to the biopsy results and clinical details, evaluated the ultrasound images for liver fibrosis. The readers specifically assessed three features - surface nodularity, liver edge, and parenchymal echotexture - with scores of 0 to 3 (0 = normal, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe). Accuracies of each sonographic feature for the detection of mild fibrosis and above (≥F1), significant fibrosis (≥F2), severe fibrosis (≥F3), and cirrhosis (F4) were determined with histopathology as the reference standard.

RESULTS: Fibrosis was present in 99 patients (F1=34, F2=20, F3=22, and F4=23) and absent in 57 patients. The sensitivities for the detection of significant fibrosis with surface nodularity, liver edge, and parenchymal echotexture were 57%, 15%, and 41%, respectively. The accuracies for the detection of ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4 stages were 50.5%, 59%, 59%, and 65% for liver surface, 51%, 53%, 54%, and 55% for liver edge, and 58%, 59%, 63%, and 63% for parenchyma echotexture, respectively. The combined scores from all three features had accuracies of 56%, 59%, 62%, and 66% for the detection of ≥F1, ≥F2, ≥F3, and F4, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Routine clinical ultrasound is a not a sensitive predictor of early fibrosis in chronic viral hepatitis. Surface nodularity is the most sensitive sonographic feature for the detection of significant fibrosis and routine clinical ultrasound is the most useful for the detection of cirrhosis.

Keywords: Accuracy; fibrosis; liver; ultrasound

References

1. J Viral Hepat. 2009 Jan;16(1):53-63 - PubMed
2. Hum Pathol. 2006 Dec;37(12):1519-26 - PubMed
3. J Hepatol. 2009 Jan;50(1):17-35 - PubMed
4. Br J Radiol. 2005 Mar;78(927):189-97 - PubMed
5. J Hepatol. 1999 Mar;30(3):472-8 - PubMed
6. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1051-5 - PubMed
7. Hepatology. 2011 Jan;53(1):325-35 - PubMed
8. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Nov 1;22(9):769-74 - PubMed
9. Hepatology. 2009 Sep;50(3):661-2 - PubMed
10. Br J Radiol. 1979 Mar;52(615):184-8 - PubMed
11. J Hepatol. 1997 Dec;27(6):979-85 - PubMed
12. Hepatology. 2009 Mar;49(3):1017-44 - PubMed
13. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Oct;97(10):2614-8 - PubMed
14. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Dec;43(12):2573-6 - PubMed
15. Hepatology. 2004 Feb;39(2):333-42 - PubMed
16. Gastroenterology. 2004 Nov;127(5 Suppl 1):S35-50 - PubMed
17. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Nov;96(11):3158-64 - PubMed
18. Hepatology. 2002 Nov;36(5 Suppl 1):S57-64 - PubMed
19. Radiology. 2003 Apr;227(1):89-94 - PubMed
20. Hepatology. 2009 Apr;49(4):1335-74 - PubMed
21. J Hepatol. 2008 Oct;49(4):564-71 - PubMed
22. Korean J Hepatol. 2010 Dec;16(4):369-75 - PubMed
23. Ann Intern Med. 1999 Aug 3;131(3):174-81 - PubMed
24. Radiology. 1986 Jul;160(1):65-71 - PubMed
25. Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 1;127(11):981-5 - PubMed
26. Clin Liver Dis. 2005 May;9(2):191-211, v - PubMed
27. Hepatology. 1994 Jul;20(1 Pt 1):15-20 - PubMed
28. Br J Radiol. 1999 Jan;72(853):29-34 - PubMed
29. Radiology. 1989 Aug;172(2):389-92 - PubMed
30. Radiology. 1992 Oct;185(1):21-3; discussion 23-4 - PubMed
31. Dig Liver Dis. 2002 Jul;34(7):516-22 - PubMed
32. J Gastroenterol. 2003;38(2):153-7 - PubMed
33. Gut. 2000 Jul;47(1):131-6 - PubMed
34. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001 Jun;125(6):736-9 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article