Display options
Share it on

Psychol Assess. 2013 Jun;25(2):313-8. doi: 10.1037/a0030834. Epub 2012 Dec 10.

Does cognitive ability influence responses to the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale?.

Psychological assessment

Ian J Deary, Roger Watson, Tom Booth, Catharine R Gale

Affiliations

  1. Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

PMID: 23230851 PMCID: PMC3744814 DOI: 10.1037/a0030834

Abstract

It has been suggested that how individuals respond to self-report items relies on cognitive processing. We hypothesized that an individual's level of cognitive ability may influence these processes such that, if there is a hierarchy of items within a particular questionnaire, as demonstrated by Mokken scaling, the strength of that hierarchy will vary according to cognitive ability. Using data on 8,643 men and women from the National Child Development Survey (1958 birth cohort; Power, & Elliott, 2006), we investigated, using Mokken scaling, whether the 14 items that make up the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (Tennant et al., 2007)-completed when the participants were 50 years of age-form a hierarchy and whether that hierarchy varied according to cognitive ability at age 11 years. Among the sample as a whole, we found a moderately strong unidimensional hierarchy of items (Loevinger's coefficient [H] = 0.48). We split participants into 3 groups according to cognitive ability and analyzed the Mokken scaling properties of each group. Only the medium and high cognitive ability groups had acceptable (≥ 0.3) invariant item ordering (assessed using the HT statistic). This pattern was also found when the 3 cognitive ability groups were assessed within men and women separately. Greater attention should be paid to the content validity of questionnaires to ensure they are applicable across the spectrum of mental ability.

PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

References

  1. Br J Health Psychol. 2003 Feb;8(Pt 1):107-22 - PubMed
  2. J Res Pers. 2010 Feb 1;44(4):53-61 - PubMed
  3. Psychol Methods. 2004 Sep;9(3):354-68 - PubMed
  4. Psychol Med. 2007 Jul;37(7):1005-13 - PubMed
  5. Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;35(1):34-41 - PubMed
  6. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Feb 19;7:15 - PubMed
  7. Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):545-55 - PubMed
  8. Int J Nurs Stud. 1996 Aug;33(4):385-93 - PubMed
  9. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Nov 27;5:63 - PubMed
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Aug;87(2):261-5 - PubMed
  11. Qual Life Res. 2003 Mar;12(2):167-76 - PubMed
  12. Psychol Med. 2008 Apr;38(4):575-9 - PubMed

MeSH terms

Publication Types

Grant support