J Clin Diagn Res. 2012 Dec;6(10):1648-52. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4800.2647. Epub 2012 Sep 08.

The role of mental distraction on the pain response in healthy young Indian adults.

Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR

Manoj Kumar, Jayballabh Kumar, Indu Saxena

PMID: 23373020 PMCID: PMC3552196 DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2012/4800.2647

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The pain sensitivity of a person depends on the type of pain, his/her genetics, racial and cultural factors. Its dependence on the gender is debatable. The significance of the psychological or the behavioural intervention in pain management is gaining importance, along with a reduction in the doses of the analgesics. We wished to investigate (a) whether Indian subjects showed a pain response which was similar to that which was reported for American subjects, (b) whether sex-related differences in the pain response were present in the Indian population, and (c) which method of mental distraction (from a choice of the presence of a male/female attendant, preferred music, and solving simple arithmetic problems) was best suited for the Indian subjects.

METHODS: The cold pressor task was performed on a group of 80 subjects (38 females who were in the proliferative or the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle) under the conditions which have been mentioned above, as well as in the absence of mental distractants.

RESULTS: The female subjects endured pain for a longer duration while they listened to the music of their choice; the male subjects endured pain longer while they were in conversation with the female attendants.

INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A comparison with the reported data showed the Indian males to be more pain-sensitive than the American males. Sex related differences in the pain sensitivity were absent in the Northern Indian subjects. Preferred music was the most effective mental distractant for females, while a conversation with the female attendants was the most effective distractant for the male subjects.

Keywords: Cold pressor task; Mental distraction; Pain response; Pain sensitivity

References

1. Mol Pain. 2008 Aug 26;4:34 - PubMed
2. Anesth Analg. 1998 Jun;86(6):1257-62 - PubMed
3. Diabetes Care. 1996 Jul;19(7):722-5 - PubMed
4. Pain. 2007 May;129(1-2):177-84 - PubMed
5. Neurology. 2005 Dec 29;65(12 Suppl 4):S7-19 - PubMed
6. J Music Ther. 2006 Winter;43(4):295-316 - PubMed
7. Anesthesiology. 2000 Dec;93(6):1517-30 - PubMed
8. Prog Brain Res. 2005;150:251-69 - PubMed
9. Eur J Pain. 2004 Oct;8(5):465-72 - PubMed
10. Anesth Analg. 2005 May;100(5):1316-1319 - PubMed
11. Science. 2004 Feb 20;303(5661):1162-7 - PubMed
12. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):343-51 - PubMed
13. J Med Genet. 2006 Aug;43(8):e40 - PubMed
14. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):545-50 - PubMed
15. J Pain. 2005 Apr;6(4):218-27 - PubMed
16. Diagn Ther Endosc. 1998;4(4):191-7 - PubMed
17. Circulation. 2004 Jul 6;110(1):74-8 - PubMed
18. Chest. 2003 Mar;123(3):941-8 - PubMed
19. Indian J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010 Jan-Mar;54(1):57-62 - PubMed
20. Clin J Pain. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):386-93 - PubMed
21. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Jul;87(1):144-52 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article