Display options
Share it on

Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Jul;3(3):262-4. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.103615.

Anti-microbial efficiency of silver diamine fluoride as an endodontic medicament - An ex vivo study.

Contemporary clinical dentistry

Vinod B Mathew, Koppolu Madhusudhana, Nuvulla Sivakumar, Thangala Venugopal, Redderu K Reddy

Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Narayana Dental College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India.

PMID: 23293478 PMCID: PMC3532785 DOI: 10.4103/0976-237X.103615

Abstract

CONTEXT: Antisepsis achieved through appropriate use of irrigants is essential for endodontic success. Identification of newer anti-bacterial agents gives alternatives to clean the canal as eradication of the infection prior to obturation does affect prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the anti-bacterial action of 3.8% silver diamine fluoride and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate against Enterococcus faecalis in root canals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-four single-rooted teeth were decoronated, and the root section was enlarged with peeso-reamer (No: 3) to standardize length and diameter. The samples were then autoclaved and divided into two study groups and two control groups. Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 was inoculated into all test samples for 72 hours. The samples were enlarged with peeso-reamer (No: 5) after placement of respective medicament for 24 hours. Shavings were collected and inoculated on Brain Heart Infusion agar for 24 hrs to measure the colony forming units.

RESULTS: Both 3.8% silver diamine fluoride and 2% chlorhexidine showed a superior capacity to sterilize the root canals than control groups.

CONCLUSION: The use of silver diamine fluoride as an endodontic irrigant is feasible as it can effectively remove the microbes present in the canal and circumpulpal dentin.

Keywords: Chlorhexidine; enterococcus faecalis; root canal medicament; silver diamine fluoride

References

  1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Aug;46(8):2668-70 - PubMed
  2. Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):344-55 - PubMed
  3. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1974 Sep;14:61-72 - PubMed
  4. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2000 Feb;18(1):9-14 - PubMed
  5. Int Endod J. 2002 Mar;35(3):221-8 - PubMed
  6. J Dent Res. 2002 Nov;81(11):767-70 - PubMed
  7. Quintessence Int. 2009 Feb;40(2):155-61 - PubMed
  8. Water Sci Technol. 2007;55(8-9):413-9 - PubMed
  9. Scand J Dent Res. 1980 Oct;88(5):389-96 - PubMed
  10. J Conserv Dent. 2011 Apr;14(2):182-6 - PubMed
  11. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1972 Sep;12:1-20 - PubMed
  12. J Dent Res. 2009 Feb;88(2):116-25 - PubMed
  13. J Endod. 2010 Jun;36(6):1026-9 - PubMed
  14. J Periodontal Res. 2001 Apr;36(2):108-13 - PubMed
  15. Prog Med Chem. 1994;31:351-70 - PubMed
  16. J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):579-82 - PubMed
  17. J Dent Res. 1987 Aug;66(8):1375-9 - PubMed
  18. J Endod. 2004 Oct;30(10):689-94 - PubMed
  19. J Wound Care. 2004 Apr;13(4):131-6 - PubMed
  20. J Endod. 2007 Dec;33(12):1473-6 - PubMed
  21. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2002 Aug;94(2):240-5 - PubMed
  22. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2006;33:17-34 - PubMed
  23. J Wound Care. 2002 May;11(5):173-7 - PubMed
  24. J Endod. 2012 Jan;38(1):95-100 - PubMed
  25. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 2001 Dec;19(6):315-8 - PubMed
  26. J Wound Care. 2002 Apr;11(4):125-30 - PubMed

Publication Types