Curr Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(1):39-47. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1210.

Evaluation of CancerChatCanada: a program of online support for Canadians affected by cancer.

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)

J Stephen, A Rojubally, K Macgregor, D McLeod, M Speca, J Taylor-Brown, K Fergus, K Collie, J Turner, S Sellick, G Mackenzie

PMID: 23443892 PMCID: PMC3557330 DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1210

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Professional-led cancer support groups can improve quality of life and address unmet needs, but most Canadians affected by cancer do not have access to or do not make use of cancer support groups. A collaborative interdisciplinary team developed, operated, and evaluated Internet-based, professional-led, live-chat support groups (osgs) for cancer patients, caregivers, and survivors across Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Our study aimed to report participant and participation characteristics in the pan-Canadian initiative known as CancerChatCanada, and to understand participant perspectives about the quality of communication and professional facilitation, overall satisfaction, and psychosocial benefits and outcomes.

METHODS: Participants in osgs provided informed consent. Participant and participation characteristics were gathered from program data collection tools and are described using frequencies, means, and chi-squares. Patient, survivor, and caregiver perspectives were derived from 102 telephone interviews conducted after osg completion and subjected to a directed qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS: The 55 professional-led osgs enrolled 351 participants from 9 provinces. More than half the participants came from rural or semirural areas, and more than 84% had no received previous cancer support. The attendance rate was 75%, the dropout rate was 26%, and 80% of participants were satisfied or very satisfied. The convenience and privacy of osgs were benefits. Meaningful communication about important and difficult topics, kinship and bonding with others, and improved mood and self-care were perceived outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that this collaborative initiative was successful in increasing reach and access, and that pan-Canadian, professional-led osgs provide psychosocial benefit to underserved and burdened cancer patients, survivors, and family caregivers.

Keywords: Cancer; Internet; confidentiality; online support; professional-led; program evaluation; psychosocial

References

1. Breast J. 2006 Mar-Apr;12(2):123-9 - PubMed
2. N Engl J Med. 2001 Dec 13;345(24):1719-26 - PubMed
3. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 - PubMed
4. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):974-86 - PubMed
5. Psychooncology. 2007 Oct;16(10):961-4 - PubMed
6. CMAJ. 2004 Jun 8;170(12):1795-801 - PubMed
7. Cancer Causes Control. 2011 Mar;22(3):359-66 - PubMed
8. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012 Jan;30(1):9-18 - PubMed
9. BMC Psychiatry. 2011 Dec 06;11:189 - PubMed
10. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2000 Apr;24(2):166-73 - PubMed
11. Psychooncology. 2005 Mar;14(3):211-20 - PubMed
12. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001 May;58(5):494-501 - PubMed
13. Inflamm Res. 2004 Aug;53 Suppl 2:S136-41 - PubMed
14. Women Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;49(5):381-404 - PubMed
15. J Cancer Surviv. 2007 Mar;1(1):1-4 - PubMed
16. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1986 Oct;54(5):608-15 - PubMed
17. Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1164-73 - PubMed
18. Psychooncology. 2007 Oct;16(10):875-87 - PubMed
19. Support Care Cancer. 2009 Aug;17(8):1117-28 - PubMed
20. Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):832-40 - PubMed
21. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1981 May;38(5):527-33 - PubMed
22. Health Law Can. 2006 Nov;27(2):29-33 - PubMed
23. Health Law Can. 2006 Aug;27(1):5-28 - PubMed
24. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2004 Jun;7(3):321-6 - PubMed
25. J Rural Health. 2003 Winter;19(1):55-62 - PubMed
26. Psychooncology. 2007 May;16(5):379-400 - PubMed
27. Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):920-5 - PubMed
28. Rural Remote Health. 2006 Apr-Jun;6(2):520 - PubMed
29. Br J Cancer. 2004 Jun 14;90(12):2297-304 - PubMed
30. Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Jun;50(2):179-86 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article