Display options
Share it on

Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2013 Mar 01;3(1):5. doi: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-5.

Is there less to social anxiety than meets the eye? Behavioral and neural responses to three socio-emotional tasks.

Biology of mood & anxiety disorders

Michal Ziv, Philippe R Goldin, Hooria Jazaieri, Kevin S Hahn, James J Gross

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Bldg, 420, Stanford, CA, USA. [email protected].

PMID: 23448192 PMCID: PMC3608942 DOI: 10.1186/2045-5380-3-5

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is widely thought to be characterized by heightened behavioral and limbic reactivity to socio-emotional stimuli. However, although behavioral findings are clear, neural findings are surprisingly mixed.

METHODS: Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we examined behavioral and brain responses in a priori emotion generative regions of interest (amygdala and insula) in 67 patients with generalized SAD and in 28 healthy controls (HC) during three distinct socio-emotional tasks. We administered these socio-emotional tasks during one fMRI scanning session: 1) looming harsh faces (Faces); 2) videotaped actors delivering social criticism (Criticism); and 3) written negative self-beliefs (Beliefs).

RESULTS: In each task, SAD patients reported heightened negative emotion, compared to HC. There were, however, no SAD versus HC differential brain responses in the amygdala and insula. Between-group whole-brain analyses confirmed no group differences in the responses of the amygdala and insula, and indicated different brain networks activated during each of the tasks. In SAD participants, social anxiety symptom severity was associated with increased BOLD signal in the left insula during the Faces task.

CONCLUSIONS: The similar responses in amygdala and insula in SAD and HC participants suggest that heightened negative emotion responses reported by patients with SAD may be related to dysfunction in higher cognitive processes (e.g., distorted appraisal, attention biases, or ineffective cognitive reappraisal). In addition, the findings of this study emphasize the differential effects of socio-emotional experimental tasks.

References

  1. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009 Jan;34(1):30-40 - PubMed
  2. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Sep;46(3):515-22 - PubMed
  3. Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Feb 1;61(3):396-404 - PubMed
  4. Brain Struct Funct. 2010 Jun;214(5-6):519-34 - PubMed
  5. Science. 2002 Nov 8;298(5596):1191-4 - PubMed
  6. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jan 1;51(1):11-7 - PubMed
  7. Neuroimage. 1997 Aug;6(2):93-103 - PubMed
  8. Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113 - PubMed
  9. Neurosci Res. 2011 Jan;69(1):67-72 - PubMed
  10. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013 Jan;70(1):87-97 - PubMed
  11. Biol Psychiatry. 2004 Dec 15;56(12):921-30 - PubMed
  12. Behav Res Ther. 1997 Aug;35(8):741-56 - PubMed
  13. Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):636-47 - PubMed
  14. Am J Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;158(8):1220-6 - PubMed
  15. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Nov;65(11):1303-12 - PubMed
  16. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jun;4(6):223-233 - PubMed
  17. J Comp Neurol. 1982 Nov 20;212(1):1-22 - PubMed
  18. Neuropsychobiology. 2005;52(3):163-8 - PubMed
  19. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;65(10):1176-84 - PubMed
  20. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2010 May 30;34(4):565-80 - PubMed
  21. Neuroimage. 2011 Sep 1;58(1):275-85 - PubMed
  22. Psychiatry Res. 2011 Jul 30;193(1):38-45 - PubMed
  23. Neuroreport. 1998 Apr 20;9(6):1223-6 - PubMed
  24. Psychiatry Res. 2006 Nov 22;148(1):55-9 - PubMed
  25. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;59(11):1027-34 - PubMed
  26. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Aug 15;60(4):383-7 - PubMed
  27. Neurology. 1992 Sep;42(9):1727-32 - PubMed
  28. Biol Psychiatry. 2005 May 1;57(9):975-81 - PubMed
  29. J Comp Neurol. 1982 Nov 20;212(1):38-52 - PubMed
  30. Neuroreport. 2004 Dec 22;15(18):2701-5 - PubMed
  31. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008 Jul 1;32(5):1251-6 - PubMed
  32. J Neurosci. 1995 Sep;15(9):5879-91 - PubMed
  33. Biol Psychol. 2010 May;84(2):304-12 - PubMed
  34. Comput Biomed Res. 1996 Jun;29(3):162-73 - PubMed
  35. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep 1;54(5):504-14 - PubMed
  36. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2009 Jul;34(4):296-302 - PubMed
  37. Biol Psychiatry. 2009 Dec 15;66(12):1091-9 - PubMed
  38. Biol Psychiatry. 2006 Mar 1;59(5):424-9 - PubMed
  39. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 Oct;31(10):2243-53 - PubMed
  40. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:693-716 - PubMed
  41. Biol Psychol. 2008 May;78(2):129-37 - PubMed
  42. Psychol Med. 2001 Aug;31(6):1025-35 - PubMed
  43. Psychiatry Res. 2004 Nov 15;132(1):13-8 - PubMed
  44. Mod Probl Pharmacopsychiatry. 1987;22:141-73 - PubMed
  45. Neuroreport. 2009 Jul 15;20(11):984-9 - PubMed
  46. Lancet. 2008 Mar 29;371(9618):1115-25 - PubMed
  47. Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):331-48 - PubMed

Publication Types