Display options
Share it on

Lett Drug Des Discov. 2011 Jan 01;8(1):93-99. doi: 10.2174/157018011793663840.

Discovery of BRM Targeted Therapies: Novel Reactivation of an Anti-cancer Gene.

Letters in drug design & discovery

Sarah Gramling, David Reisman

Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville Florida 32611, USA.

PMID: 23565070 PMCID: PMC3615482 DOI: 10.2174/157018011793663840

Abstract

Drug discovery in the field of oncology has been advanced mainly through the targeting of receptor tyrosine kinases. Both antibodies and small molecule inhibitors have been found to have successful applications in blocking the proliferative functions of these cell surface receptors. Based on these early successes, additional kinases within the cytoplasm have been found to promote cancer and, as such, have been recognized as feasible targets for additional modes of therapies. Unlike these oncogene targets, most tumor suppressors are irreversibly altered during cancer progression and therefore are not feasible targets for therapy. However, a subset of these genes is reversibly epigenetically suppressed. One such gene is BRM, and when it is re-expressed in cancer cells, this gene halts their growth. Moreover, as the key catalytic subunit of the SWI/SNF complex, BRM is centrally important to a host of anticancer pathways and cellular mechanisms, and its status may serve as a biomarker. Restoring its expression will both reconnect a number of growth-controlling pathways and affect cellular adhesion, DNA repair, and immune functions. For these reasons, restoring BRM expression is not only feasible, but potentially a potent form of anticancer therapy. To identify BRM-restoring compounds, we developed a cell-based luciferase assay. In this review, we discuss some of the challenges we encountered, issues related to this type of drug discovery, and our future ambitions. We hope this review will provide insight to this type of endeavor and lead to more investigations pursuing this type of drug research.

Keywords: Anticancer; Brahma; Epigenetic suppression; High throughput screening; SWI/SNF; Tumor suppressor

References

  1. J Mol Diagn. 2003 May;5(2):73-81 - PubMed
  2. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2005;70:241-50 - PubMed
  3. Oncogene. 2009 Jul 9;28(27):2492-501 - PubMed
  4. J Med Chem. 2002 Feb 14;45(4):818-40 - PubMed
  5. J Biol Chem. 2006 Nov 17;281(46):35305-15 - PubMed
  6. Mol Cells. 2005 Apr 30;19(2):289-93 - PubMed
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3364-9 - PubMed
  8. Oncogene. 2002 Feb 14;21(8):1196-207 - PubMed
  9. EMBO Rep. 2009 Jul;10(7):776-82 - PubMed
  10. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4(2):67-73 - PubMed
  11. J Biol Chem. 2001 Mar 23;276(12):9273-8 - PubMed
  12. Cell. 2000 Mar 31;101(1):79-89 - PubMed
  13. J Biol Chem. 2008 May 2;283(18):11924-34 - PubMed
  14. EMBO J. 2003 Dec 15;22(24):6505-15 - PubMed
  15. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996;122(6):319-27 - PubMed
  16. Biochem Cell Biol. 2001;79(3):243-52 - PubMed
  17. Oncogene. 2005 Aug 18;24(35):5471-81 - PubMed
  18. Cell. 1994 Oct 7;79(1):119-30 - PubMed
  19. Mol Cell Biol. 2007 Feb;27(4):1280-95 - PubMed
  20. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Jan;13(1):22-9 - PubMed
  21. Oncogene. 2007 Oct 25;26(49):7058-66 - PubMed
  22. Oncogene. 2009 Apr 9;28(14):1653-68 - PubMed
  23. EMBO J. 2006 Sep 6;25(17):3986-97 - PubMed
  24. EMBO J. 1998 Dec 1;17(23):6979-91 - PubMed
  25. Cell Cycle. 2008 Apr 15;7(8):1067-74 - PubMed
  26. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;16(4):1576-83 - PubMed
  27. J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 1;277(44):41674-85 - PubMed
  28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 5;97(14):7748-53 - PubMed
  29. J Biol Chem. 2002 Jun 21;277(25):22330-7 - PubMed
  30. Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Sep;23(17):6210-20 - PubMed
  31. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jan;16(1):437-41 - PubMed
  32. DNA Repair (Amst). 2009 Jan 1;8(1):29-39 - PubMed
  33. Nature. 1998 May 7;393(6680):88-91 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support