Display options
Share it on

Asian Spine J. 2013 Mar;7(1):8-13. doi: 10.4184/asj.2013.7.1.8. Epub 2013 Mar 06.

The degree of bacterial contamination while performing spine surgery.

Asian spine journal

Dong Ki Ahn, Hoon Seok Park, Tae Woo Kim, Jong Hwa Yang, Kyung Hwan Boo, In Ja Kim, Hye Jin Lee

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul Sacred Heart General Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

PMID: 23508998 PMCID: PMC3596589 DOI: 10.4184/asj.2013.7.1.8

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective experimental study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate bacterial contamination during surgery.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The participants of surgery and ventilation system have been known as the most significant sources of contamination.

METHODS: Two pairs of air culture blood agar plate for G(+) bacteria and MacConkey agar plate for G(-) bacteria were placed at 3 different locations in a conventional operation room: in the surgical field, under the airflow of local air conditioner, and pathway to door while performing spine surgeries. One pair of culture plates was retrieved after one hour and the other pair was retrieved after 3 hours. The cultured bacteria were identified and number of colonies was counted.

RESULTS: There was no G(-) bacteria identified. G(+) bacteria grew on all 90 air culture blood agar plates. The colony count of one hour group was 14.5±5.4 in the surgical field, 11.3±6.6 under the local air conditioner, and 13.1±8.7 at the pathway to the door. There was no difference among the 3 locations. The colony count of 3 hours group was 46.4±19.5, 30.3±12.9, and 39.7±15.2, respectively. It was more at the surgical field than under the air conditioner (p=0.03). The number of colonies of one hour group was 13.0±7.0 and 3 hours group was 38.8±17.1. There was positive correlation between the time and the number of colonies (r=0.76, p=0.000).

CONCLUSIONS: Conventional operation room was contaminated by G(+) bacteria. The degree of contamination was most high at the surgical field. The number of bacteria increased right proportionally to the time.

Keywords: Bacterial contamination; Source of contamination; Surgical site infection

References

  1. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2010 Sep 21;5(2): - PubMed
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Oct 15;29(20):2330-4 - PubMed
  3. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973 Oct;(96):222-33 - PubMed
  4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):99-108 - PubMed
  5. J Hosp Infect. 2001 Aug;48(4):267-74 - PubMed
  6. J Spinal Disord. 1999 Jun;12(3):187-91 - PubMed
  7. Rev Infect Dis. 1991 Sep-Oct;13 Suppl 10:S800-4 - PubMed
  8. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2008 Dec;9(6):579-84 - PubMed
  9. J Neurosurg. 2003 Mar;98(2 Suppl):149-55 - PubMed
  10. South Med J. 1998 Dec;91(12):1132-6 - PubMed
  11. Lancet. 1981 Apr 11;1(8224):795-6 - PubMed
  12. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1723-6 - PubMed
  13. Clin Infect Dis. 1992 Jun;14(6):1186-94 - PubMed
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Mar;46:293-312 - PubMed
  15. Acta Orthop Belg. 1999 Jun;65(2):182-7 - PubMed
  16. J Neurosurg. 1975 Dec;43(6):727-31 - PubMed
  17. Neth J Med. 1998 Jun;52(6):219-27 - PubMed
  18. J Spinal Disord. 1998 Apr;11(2):124-8 - PubMed
  19. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Aug;74(7):1056-67 - PubMed
  20. N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 28;330(17):1247-51 - PubMed
  21. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1972 Sep;87:167-87 - PubMed
  22. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Jul;22(3):363-71 - PubMed
  23. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Oct;59(7):847-55 - PubMed
  24. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Feb;13(1):42-5 - PubMed

Publication Types