Display options
Share it on

Age (Dordr). 2005 Mar;27(1):59-67. doi: 10.1007/s11357-005-4005-8. Epub 2005 May 02.

Accommodative function in rhesus monkeys: effects of aging and calorie restriction.

Age (Dordrecht, Netherlands)

J A Mattison, M A Croft, D B Dahl, G S Roth, M A Lane, D K Ingram, P L Kaufman

Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Experimental Gerontology, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA.

PMID: 23598604 PMCID: PMC3456094 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-005-4005-8

Abstract

Numerous degenerative changes in the visual system occur with age, including a loss of accommodative function possibly related to hardening of the lens or loss of ciliary muscle mobility. The rhesus monkey is a reliable animal model for studying age-related changes in ocular function, including loss of accommodation. Calorie restriction (CR) is the only consistent intervention to slow aging and extend lifespan in rodents, and more recently the beneficial effects of CR have been reported in nonhuman primates. The goal of the present study was to evaluate age-related changes in ocular accommodation and the potential effect of long-term (>8 years) CR on accommodation in male and female rhesus monkeys. Refraction, accommodation (Hartinger coincidence refractometer), and lens thickness (A-scan ultrasound) were measured in 97 male and female rhesus monkeys age 8-36 years under Telazol/acepromazine anesthesia. Refraction and accommodation measurements were taken before and after 40% carbachol corneal iontophoresis to induce maximum accommodation. Half the animals were in the control (CON) group and were fed ad libitum. The CR group received 30% fewer calories than age- and weight-matched controls. Males were on CR for 12 years and females for eight years. With increasing age, accommodative ability declined in both CON and CR monkeys by 1.03 ± 0.12 (P = 0.001) and 1.18 ± 0.12 (P = 0.001) diopters/year, respectively. The age-related decline did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.374). Baseline lens thickness increased with age in both groups by 0.03 ± 0.005 mm/year (P = 0.001) and 0.02 ± 0.005 mm/year (P = 0.001) for the CON and CR groups, respectively. The tendency for the for the lens to thicken with age occurred at a slower rate in the CR group vs. the CON group but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.086). Baseline refraction was -2.8 ± 0.55 and -3.0 ± 0.62 diopters for CON and CR, respectively. Baseline refraction tended to become slightly more negative with age (P = 0.070), but this trend did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.587). In summary, there was no difference in the slope of the age-related changes in accommodation, lens thickness, or refraction in the carbachol-treated eyes due to diet. These data are consistent with previous findings of decreased accommodative ability in aging rhesus monkeys, comparable to the age-dependent decrease in accommodative ability in humans. This study is the first to indicate that the accommodative system may not benefit from calorie restriction.

Keywords: Macaca mulatta; accommodation; diet; refraction; vision

References

  1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(3):294-6 - PubMed
  2. J Physiol. 1969 Mar;201(1):1-19 - PubMed
  3. FASEB J. 2001 May;15(7):1285-7 - PubMed
  4. Trans Ophthalmol Soc U K. 1982;102 Pt 3:323-6 - PubMed
  5. Neurobiol Aging. 2005 Jul;26(7):1117-27 - PubMed
  6. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1982 Jul;23(1):23-31 - PubMed
  7. J Physiol. 1973 Feb;228(3):765-79 - PubMed
  8. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jul;86(7):3292-5 - PubMed
  9. Arch Ophthalmol. 1992 Jun;110(6):871-6 - PubMed
  10. Am J Physiol. 1998 Dec;275(6):R1885-97 - PubMed
  11. J Gerontol. 1993 Jan;48(1):B17-26 - PubMed
  12. Curr Eye Res. 1990 Jun;9(6):525-32 - PubMed
  13. Mech Ageing Dev. 2000 Mar 13;114(2):133-47 - PubMed
  14. Neurobiol Aging. 2000 Sep-Oct;21(5):639-45 - PubMed
  15. Vision Res. 1998 Jan;38(2):209-29 - PubMed
  16. Arch Ophthalmol. 1980 Mar;98(3):542-6 - PubMed
  17. Exp Neurol. 1989 Mar;103(3):290-2 - PubMed
  18. Exp Eye Res. 1987 Aug;45(2):317-26 - PubMed
  19. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1922;20:132-57 - PubMed
  20. Brain Res. 1989 Dec 4;503(2):265-72 - PubMed
  21. Exp Eye Res. 1982 Feb;34(2):287-91 - PubMed
  22. Neurobiol Aging. 1991 Sep-Oct;12(5):455-62 - PubMed
  23. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1991 Apr;32(5):1678-92 - PubMed
  24. Vision Res. 1973 Jun;13(6):1035-40 - PubMed
  25. J Gerontol. 1990 Sep;45(5):B148-63 - PubMed
  26. Neurobiol Aging. 2003 Jan-Feb;24(1):167-72 - PubMed
  27. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997 Jul;82(7):2093-6 - PubMed
  28. J Gerontol. 1993 Mar;48(2):B62-7 - PubMed

Publication Types