Korean J Pathol. 2013 Feb;47(1):21-7. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.1.21. Epub 2013 Feb 25.

Histopathological causes of late liver allograft dysfunction: analysis at a single institution.

Korean journal of pathology

Eun Shin, Ji Hoon Kim, Eunsil Yu

PMID: 23483073 PMCID: PMC3589605 DOI: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2013.47.1.21

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We summarize our experience in the pathological diagnosis of late complications of liver transplantation (LT) to better understand the causes of late allograft dysfunction in a population mostly composed of patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection.

METHODS: We reviewed 361 post-transplant liver biopsies from 174 patients who underwent LT and first presented with liver function abnormalities 3 months post-procedure. The underlying diseases included HBV-associated liver disease (77%), toxic or alcoholic liver disease (10.3%), hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated liver disease (8.6%), primary biliary cirrhosis (1.2%), primary sclerosing cholangitis (1.2%), and metabolic disease (1.7%).

RESULTS: The three most common late complications were acute rejection (32.5%), recurrent disease (19.1%), and biliary complication (17.1%). Patients who underwent LT for HBV infection or for drug- or alcohol-related liver disease had a lower incidence of recurring disease than those who underwent transplantation for HCV infection. During post-transplantation months 3-12, acute rejection was the most common cause of allograft dysfunction and recurring disease was the leading cause for allograft dysfunction (p=0.039). The two primary causes of late allograft dysfunction have overlapping histological features, although acute rejection more frequently showed bile duct damage and vascular endothelialitis than recurring HBV infection, and recurring HBV infection had more frequent lobular activity and piecemeal necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS: The causes of late liver allograft dysfunction are closely associated with the original liver diseases and the period after LT. Careful attention is required for differential diagnosis between acute rejection and recurrent HBV.

Keywords: Biopsy; Complication; Liver transplantation

References

1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Dec 08;(12):CD006573 - PubMed
2. Hepatology. 1998 Sep;28(3):638-45 - PubMed
3. Liver Transpl. 2005 Nov;(11 Suppl 2):S63-8 - PubMed
4. Liver Transpl. 2009 Nov;15 Suppl 2:S19-24 - PubMed
5. Am J Pathol. 1986 Oct;125(1):161-72 - PubMed
6. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011 Oct;16(5):505-8 - PubMed
7. Am J Surg Pathol. 1999 Nov;23(11):1328-39 - PubMed
8. Transpl Int. 2010 Oct;23(10):971-83 - PubMed
9. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2004;27 Suppl 2:91-101 - PubMed
10. Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):1240-2 - PubMed
11. Transplantation. 1995 Nov 27;60(10):1098-103 - PubMed
12. Histopathology. 2010 Sep;57(3):333-41 - PubMed
13. J Clin Pathol. 2010 Jan;63(1):47-74 - PubMed
14. Clin Transplant. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):316-23 - PubMed
15. Transplant Proc. 2009 Mar;41(2):773-6 - PubMed
16. Transplantation. 1992 Nov;54(5):821-4 - PubMed
17. Liver Transpl. 2001 Nov;7(11 Suppl 1):S60-73 - PubMed
18. Hepatology. 2006 May;43(5):1109-17 - PubMed
19. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 May;25(5):872-9 - PubMed
20. Transpl Int. 2009 Mar;22(3):303-12 - PubMed
21. Am J Surg Pathol. 1995 Feb;19(2):192-206 - PubMed
22. Liver Transpl Surg. 1999 Jul;5(4 Suppl 1):S30-6 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article