Display options
Share it on

J Am Aging Assoc. 2003 Jan;26(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s11357-003-0001-z.

The effect of aging on phenylephrine response in normal subjects.

Journal of the American Aging Association

Kenneth M Madden, Wayne C Levy, Arnold Jacobson, John R Stratton

Affiliations

  1. Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington ; Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington ; Department of Geriatric Medicine, Vancouver Hospital and Health Science Center, S124-2211 Westbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 2B5.

PMID: 23604913 PMCID: PMC3456817 DOI: 10.1007/s11357-003-0001-z

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: With aging, cardiac responses to β-adrenergic stimulation decline but the responses to α1-stimulation are less clear. Moreover, whether aging, in the absence of disease, influences the left ventricular response to an increase in afterload is unclear. This study examined the effect of aging on heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), cardiac index (CI) and several left ventricular contractility measurements during α 1-stimulation with a phenylephrine infusion.

METHODS: Subjects were rigorously screened to be normal by history, physical, blood tests, ECG, ETT and echocardiogram. Twelve young (mean 26 years, all male) and 15 aged (69 years, 11 males) subjects were studied during 10 minute infusions of phenylephrine at 0.5 and 1.0 mcg/ kg/min. HR, BP and radionuclide ventriculographic cardiac volumes were measured.

RESULTS: Systolic BP increased more in the aged than in the young (22 vs. 13%, p=0.003), while heart rate (16 vs. 21%, p=0.05) fell less. Contractile responses to phenylephrine, including EF, stroke volume index (SVI), stroke work index and left ventricular contractility index were not altered with aging. Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was higher at baseline and at each infusion rate, but there was no age-associate change in the response to PE.

CONCLUSIONS: In a healthy normal aged population, a preserved SVI response in the setting of a higher baseline SVR results in an increased SBP response to α1-stimulation. Contractile responses to increased afterload are not altered with aging. Age-associated differences in the response to α1-stimulation are small and are explained by altered baroreflex sensitivity and a stiffer vasculature.

References

  1. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1999 Jan;54(1):M17-24 - PubMed
  2. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1982 May-Jun;4(3):388-92 - PubMed
  3. Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9):3224-32 - PubMed
  4. Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):504-12 - PubMed
  5. Am J Cardiol. 1988 Nov 15;62(16):1103-8 - PubMed
  6. Am J Physiol. 1995 Jan;268(1 Pt 2):H92-9 - PubMed
  7. Hypertension. 1996 Dec;28(6):953-60 - PubMed
  8. Am J Physiol. 1987 Dec;253(6 Pt 2):H1566-72 - PubMed
  9. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1996 Sep 12;60(3):209-12 - PubMed
  10. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1991 Jul;69(7):909-13 - PubMed
  11. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1976 Mar;23(2):111-24 - PubMed
  12. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Feb;12(2 Pt 1):151-8 - PubMed
  13. Circulation. 2001 Nov 13;104(20):2424-9 - PubMed
  14. Am J Physiol. 1992 Oct;263(4 Pt 2):H1190-6 - PubMed
  15. J Hypertens Suppl. 1989 Dec;7(6):S88-9 - PubMed
  16. Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 2):R1625-31 - PubMed
  17. Microvasc Res. 1994 Nov;48(3):303-15 - PubMed
  18. Circulation. 1992 Aug;86(2):513-21 - PubMed
  19. Am J Med. 1983 Sep 26;75(3A):34-9 - PubMed
  20. Circulation. 1996 Dec 1;94(11):2768-77 - PubMed
  21. Crit Care Med. 1989 Dec;17(12):1324-7 - PubMed
  22. J Nucl Med. 1992 May;33(5):763-70 - PubMed
  23. Circulation. 1999 Dec 7;100(23):2336-43 - PubMed
  24. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 1;76(1):89-91 - PubMed
  25. Eur J Pharmacol. 1988 Jan 27;146(1):1-5 - PubMed
  26. Anesth Analg. 1984 Mar;63(3):290-6 - PubMed
  27. Am J Physiol. 1994 May;266(5 Pt 1):E717-24 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Dec;79(1):69-73 - PubMed
  29. Am J Cardiol. 1989 Feb 1;63(5):368-9 - PubMed
  30. Gen Pharmacol. 1991;22(1):77-82 - PubMed
  31. Presse Med. 1992 Jul 22;21(26):1222-6 - PubMed

Publication Types