Display options
Share it on

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Jan;29(1):83-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.105809.

Effects of repeat exposure to inhalation anesthetics on liver and renal function.

Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology

Tomoki Nishiyama

Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Higashi Omiya General Hospital, Higashi Omiya, Minuma-ku, Saitama, Japan.

PMID: 23493664 PMCID: PMC3590549 DOI: 10.4103/0970-9185.105809

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cross hypersensitivity to inhalation anesthetics has not been studied. The aim of this study was to investigate it by comparing liver and renal function after repeated anesthesia with sevoflurane and isoflurane retrospectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The adult patients who received general anesthesia twice within the interval of 14 days to 1 year were retrospectively analyzed. Those who received sevoflurane anesthesia twice (SS group, 53 cases), isoflurane anesthesia twice (II group, 31 cases), sevoflurane followed by isoflurane anesthesia (SI group, 29 cases), isoflurane followed by sevoflurane anesthesia (IS group, 35 cases), and propofol-fentanyl anesthesia twice (PP group, 58 cases) were enrolled. Serum concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), total bilirubin (Bil), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GTP), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine (Cr) measured 1-3, 5-8, and 12-16 days after surgery were investigated.

RESULTS: In the IS group, the number of the patients with abnormal values of ALT and γ-GTP 5-8 days after surgery were significantly smaller at second anesthesia compared to the first anesthesia. The number of the patients with abnormal values of AST, ALT, and γ-GTP were significantly larger in the II group than the SS and PP groups. The number of patients who had higher values in each parameter at second anesthesia compared to the first anesthesia was not different among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and isoflurane might have no cross hypersensitivity. Both anesthetics might not have any additional risks to increase liver and renal damage by second anesthesia.

Keywords: General anesthesia; isoflurane; kidney; liver; propofol; sevoflurane

References

  1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999 Mar;43(3):347-51 - PubMed
  2. Anesthesiology. 1998 Aug;89(2):307-22 - PubMed
  3. Anesthesiology. 1995 Dec;83(6):1361-4 - PubMed
  4. Anesth Analg. 1998 Aug;87(2):468-73 - PubMed
  5. Anesthesiology. 1990 Dec;73(6):1208-13 - PubMed
  6. Masui. 2002 Oct;51(10):1086-93 - PubMed
  7. Masui. 1997 Mar;46(3):351-7 - PubMed
  8. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1971 Jul;18(4):387-96 - PubMed
  9. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Feb;74(2):164-7 - PubMed
  10. Anesthesiology. 1992 Sep;77(3):541-5 - PubMed
  11. Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):125-9 - PubMed
  12. Br J Anaesth. 1977 Oct;49(10):1035-9 - PubMed
  13. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Jan;22(1):112-5 - PubMed
  14. Anesthesiology. 1990 Mar;72(3):504-9 - PubMed
  15. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Aug;45(8):789-93 - PubMed
  16. Anesthesiology. 1988 Dec;69(6):833-8 - PubMed
  17. Hepatology. 1991 Jun;13(6):1017-21 - PubMed
  18. Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):347-52 - PubMed

Publication Types