Display options
Cite
Hansen MA, Hidayat BJ, Mogensen KK, et al. Enzyme affinity to cell types in wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) before and after hydrothermal pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6(1):54doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-54.
Hansen, M. A., Hidayat, B. J., Mogensen, K. K., Jeppesen, M. D., Jørgensen, B., Johansen, K. S., & Thygesen, L. G. (2013). Enzyme affinity to cell types in wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) before and after hydrothermal pretreatment. Biotechnology for biofuels, 6(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-54
Hansen, Mads At, et al. "Enzyme affinity to cell types in wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) before and after hydrothermal pretreatment." Biotechnology for biofuels vol. 6,1 (2013): 54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-6-54
Hansen MA, Hidayat BJ, Mogensen KK, Jeppesen MD, Jørgensen B, Johansen KS, Thygesen LG. Enzyme affinity to cell types in wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) before and after hydrothermal pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Apr 16;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-54. PMID: 23590820; PMCID: PMC3650653.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013 Apr 16;6(1):54. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-54.

Enzyme affinity to cell types in wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) before and after hydrothermal pretreatment.

Biotechnology for biofuels

Mads At Hansen, Budi J Hidayat, Kit K Mogensen, Martin D Jeppesen, Bodil Jørgensen, Katja S Johansen, Lisbeth G Thygesen

Affiliations

  1. Forest and Landscape, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, Frederiksberg C DK-1958, Denmark. [email protected].

PMID: 23590820 PMCID: PMC3650653 DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-54

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wheat straw used for bioethanol production varies in enzymatic digestibility according to chemical structure and composition of cell walls and tissues. In this work, the two biologically different wheat straw organs, leaves and stems, are described together with the effects of hydrothermal pretreatment on chemical composition, tissue structure, enzyme adhesion and digestion. To highlight the importance of inherent cell wall characteristics and the diverse effects of mechanical disruption and biochemical degradation, separate leaves and stems were pretreated on lab-scale and their tissue structures maintained mostly intact for image analysis. Finally, samples were enzymatically hydrolysed to correlate digestibility to chemical composition, removal of polymers, tissue composition and disruption, particle size and enzyme adhesion as a result of pretreatment and wax removal. For comparison, industrially pretreated wheat straw from Inbicon A/S was included in all the experiments.

RESULTS: Within the same range of pretreatment severities, industrial pretreatment resulted in most hemicellulose and epicuticular wax/cutin removal compared to lab-scale pretreated leaves and stems but also in most re-deposition of lignin on the surface. Tissues were furthermore degraded from tissues into individual cells while lab-scale pretreated samples were structurally almost intact. In both raw leaves and stems, endoglucanase and exoglucanase adhered most to parenchyma cells; after pretreatment, to epidermal cells in all the samples. Despite heavy tissue disruption, industrially pretreated samples were not as susceptible to enzymatic digestion as lab-scale pretreated leaves while lab-scale pretreated stems were the least digestible.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite preferential enzyme adhesion to epidermal cells after hydrothermal pretreatment, our results suggest that the single most important factor determining wheat straw digestibility is the fraction of parenchyma cells rather than effective tissue disruption.

References

  1. Biotechnol Lett. 2013 Feb;35(2):189-95 - PubMed
  2. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jun;101(12):4577-83 - PubMed
  3. Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Nov-Dec;23(6):1333-9 - PubMed
  4. J Biol Chem. 1993 Oct 5;268(28):20756-61 - PubMed
  5. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2008 Dec 1;101(5):913-25 - PubMed
  6. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 May;35(5):377-391 - PubMed
  7. Bioresour Technol. 2005 Apr;96(6):673-86 - PubMed
  8. Bioresour Technol. 2007 Sep;98(13):2503-10 - PubMed
  9. Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1055-60 - PubMed
  10. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:641-664 - PubMed
  11. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2003 Oct 20;84(2):151-9 - PubMed
  12. Science. 1994 Jul 22;265(5171):524-8 - PubMed
  13. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2010;61:263-89 - PubMed
  14. Bioresour Technol. 2010 Jul;101(13):4744-53 - PubMed
  15. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Mar;107:243-50 - PubMed
  16. Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):2804-11 - PubMed
  17. Biotechnol Lett. 2013 Feb;35(2):213-8 - PubMed
  18. Biotechnol Prog. 2007 Sep-Oct;23(5):1130-7 - PubMed
  19. J Phys Chem B. 2010 Jan 28;114(3):1447-53 - PubMed
  20. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2007 Apr 1;96(5):862-70 - PubMed
  21. Bioresour Technol. 2009 Jan;100(1):10-8 - PubMed
  22. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2009 May;156(1-3):127-32 - PubMed
  23. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 30;88(7):797-824 - PubMed
  24. New Phytol. 2006;172(2):305-18 - PubMed
  25. Bioresour Technol. 2011 Feb;102(3):2881-9 - PubMed
  26. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008 May;35(5):355-366 - PubMed
  27. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2000 Spring;84-86:111-27 - PubMed
  28. J Biotechnol. 2004 Jan 8;107(1):65-72 - PubMed
  29. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2008 Apr 16;1(1):5 - PubMed
  30. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Dec;126:208-15 - PubMed
  31. Bioresour Technol. 2012 Jun;114:389-98 - PubMed
  32. Science. 2007 Feb 9;315(5813):804-7 - PubMed
  33. Biotechnol Prog. 1999 Oct 1;15(5):804-816 - PubMed

Publication Types