Display options
Share it on

Front Psychol. 2013 May 06;4:248. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00248. eCollection 2013.

Low Spatial Frequency Bias in Schizophrenia is Not Face Specific: When the Integration of Coarse and Fine Information Fails.

Frontiers in psychology

Vincent Laprevote, Aude Oliva, Anne-Sophie Ternois, Raymund Schwan, Pierre Thomas, Muriel Boucart

Affiliations

  1. Centre d'Investigation Clinique-INSERM 9501, CHU Nancy Nancy, France ; Centre de Soins, d'Accompagnement et de Prévention en Addictologie, CHU Nancy Nancy, France.

PMID: 23653616 PMCID: PMC3644708 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00248

Abstract

Studies have shown that patients with schizophrenia exhibit visual processing impairments, particularly regarding the processing of spatial frequencies. In a previous work, we found that, compared to healthy volunteers, patients were biased toward low spatial frequencies (LSF) to identify facial expression at a glance. Given the ubiquity of faces in visual perception, it remains an open question whether the LSF bias is face specific or also occurs with other visual objects. Here, 15 patients with schizophrenia and 11 healthy control adults performed a categorization task with hybrid stimuli. These stimuli were single images consisting of two different objects, a fruit and an animal, each in a specific spatial frequency range, either low (LSF) or high (HSF). Observers were asked to report if they saw an animal or a fruit. The reported category demonstrated which spatial scale was preferentially perceived in each trial. In a control experiment, participants performed the same task but with images of only a single object, either a LSF or HSF filtered animal or fruit, to verify that participants could perceive both HSF or LSF when presented in isolation. The results on the categorization task showed that patients chose more frequently LSF with hybrid stimuli compared to healthy controls. However, both populations performed equally well with HSF and LSF filtered pictures in the control experiment, demonstrating that the LSF preference found with hybrid stimuli in patients was not due to an inability to perceive HSF. The LSF preference found in schizophrenia confirms our previous study conducted with faces, and shows that this LSF bias generalizes to other categories of objects. When a broad range of spatial frequencies are present in the image, as in normal conditions of viewing, patients preferentially rely on coarse visual information contained in LSF. This result may be interpreted as a dysfunction of the guidance of HSF processing by LSF processing.

Keywords: hybrid image; magnocellular; object; schizophrenia; spatial frequency; vision

References

  1. Perception. 2005;34(1):77-86 - PubMed
  2. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2008 May;13(3):185-209 - PubMed
  3. Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3583-90 - PubMed
  4. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Nov;59(11):1011-20 - PubMed
  5. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13(2):261-76 - PubMed
  6. Schizophr Res. 2006 Oct;87(1-3):238-45 - PubMed
  7. Eye (Lond). 1990;4 ( Pt 6):806-12 - PubMed
  8. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005 May;62(5):495-504 - PubMed
  9. Schizophr Bull. 2013 May;39(3):547-54 - PubMed
  10. Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):1914-27 - PubMed
  11. Percept Psychophys. 1996 May;58(4):602-12 - PubMed
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):449-54 - PubMed
  13. Vision Res. 2007 Oct;47(23):2923-33 - PubMed
  14. Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 1;28(2):464-73 - PubMed
  15. Schizophr Bull. 2009 Nov;35(6):1085-94 - PubMed
  16. Front Psychol. 2012 Oct 30;3:462 - PubMed
  17. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 May;64(5):532-42 - PubMed
  18. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 12;366(1571):1726-38 - PubMed
  19. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;22(2):140-6 - PubMed
  20. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28 - PubMed
  21. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;67(8):772-82 - PubMed
  22. Schizophr Bull. 2011 Sep;37(5):1001-8 - PubMed
  23. Vis Neurosci. 2007 Mar-Apr;24(2):183-9 - PubMed
  24. J Neurosci. 2008 Jul 23;28(30):7492-500 - PubMed
  25. Exp Brain Res. 2004 May;156(2):196-211 - PubMed
  26. Schizophr Res. 2003 Nov 15;64(2-3):91-101 - PubMed
  27. Brain. 2007 Feb;130(Pt 2):417-30 - PubMed
  28. Emotion. 2011 Oct;11(5):1144-51 - PubMed
  29. Cognition. 1999 Jan 1;69(3):243-65 - PubMed
  30. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2005 Mar;18(2):151-7 - PubMed
  31. Brain Cogn. 2006 Dec;62(3):214-20 - PubMed
  32. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1995 Feb;117(3):379-84 - PubMed
  33. Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Jul;191:5-13 - PubMed
  34. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2002 Spring;14(2):190-6 - PubMed
  35. Cogn Psychol. 1997 Oct;34(1):72-107 - PubMed
  36. J Neurosci. 2007 Nov 28;27(48):13232-40 - PubMed
  37. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 - PubMed
  38. Psychol Sci. 2009 Oct;20(10):1202-8 - PubMed
  39. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Aug;5(8):617-29 - PubMed
  40. Vision Res. 1988;28(3):419-32 - PubMed
  41. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Dec;48(14):4164-8 - PubMed
  42. J Abnorm Psychol. 1998 Feb;107(1):49-62 - PubMed
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Apr;83(8):2755-7 - PubMed

Publication Types