Display options
Share it on

Can Urol Assoc J. 2013 Mar-Apr;7(3):E226-30. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.540.

Clinical significance of suboptimal hormonal levels in men with prostate cancer treated with LHRH agonists.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada

Jun Kawakami, Alvaro Morales

Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB;

PMID: 23671531 PMCID: PMC3650764 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.540

Abstract

PURPOSE: We examined the serum levels of testosterone (T) (total and bioavailable) dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in men receiving treatment with luteinizing hormone releasing-hormone (LHRH) agonists for metastatic prostate cancer. In doing this, we want to determine the efficacy of these agents in lowering T levels and whether a possible relationship exists between PSA values, as a surrogate measure of tumour activity, and hormone levels.

METHODS: This was a single centre prospective study of patients on LHRH agonists. Of all the 100 eligible patients, 31 did not qualify (10 were receiving their first injection, 13 were on intermittent hormonal therapy, 7 refused to enter the trial and 1 patient's blood sample was lost). Therefore in total, 69 patients were included in the final analysis. Each patient had their blood sample drawn immediately before the administration of a LHRH agonist. The new proposed criteria of <20 ng/dL (0.69 nmol/L) of total testosterone was used to define optimal levels of the hormone in this population.

RESULTS: Of the 69 patients, 41 were on goserelin injections, 21 on leuprolide, and 7 on buserelin. There was no statistical difference in hormone levels between any of the medications. Overall, 21% of patients failed to reach optimal levels of total testosterone. PSA levels were higher in this group. There was a statistically significant correlation between PSA and testosterone levels, as well as between PSA and FSH. Serum levels of PSA, however, did not correlate with those of bioavailable testosterone.

CONCLUSIONS: Failure to reach optimal levels of testosterone occurs in patients on LHRH agonist therapy. Higher PSA values are more commonly found in patients with suboptimal levels of testosterone receiving LHRH analogs, but the clinical importance of this finding has not been established. There is no significant difference with respect to hormonal levels reached among patients on a variety of LHRH agonists. Total testosterone determinations should be considered in patients on LHRH agonist therapy, particularly when the PSA values begin to rise since it may lead to further beneficial hormonal manipulation.

References

  1. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012 Sep;10(9):1081-7 - PubMed
  2. Rev Urol. 2012;14(1-2):1-12 - PubMed
  3. Urology. 2001 Nov;58(5):756-61 - PubMed
  4. J Urol. 2012 May;187(5):1601-6 - PubMed
  5. J Urol. 2000 Sep;164(3 Pt 1):726-9 - PubMed
  6. BJU Int. 2010 Mar;105(5):648-51 - PubMed
  7. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Feb;92(2):405-13 - PubMed
  8. Urol Int. 2006;77(2):135-8 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999 Oct;84(10):3666-72 - PubMed
  10. Rev Urol. 2009 Spring;11(2):52-60 - PubMed
  11. Urology. 1997 Nov;50(5):784-8 - PubMed
  12. Urology. 1996 Dec;48(6):894-900 - PubMed
  13. Urology. 1998 Feb;51(2):271-6 - PubMed
  14. Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1177-81 - PubMed
  15. J Urol. 1999 Mar;161(3):970-6 - PubMed
  16. Endocrinology. 2007 Jul;148(7):3089-101 - PubMed
  17. Urology. 2001 May;57(5):975 - PubMed
  18. N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 8;339(15):1036-42 - PubMed
  19. Urology. 1995 Aug;46(2):220-6 - PubMed
  20. Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):1021-4 - PubMed
  21. Can J Urol. 2012 Oct;19(5):6414-6 - PubMed
  22. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Jun;95(6):2536-59 - PubMed
  23. J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 1):1290-5 - PubMed
  24. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt B):E500-7 - PubMed
  25. Ther Adv Urol. 2011 Jun;3(3):127-40 - PubMed

Publication Types