Indian J Orthop. 2013 May;47(3):264-71. doi: 10.4103/0019-5413.111492.
Slipped upper femoral epiphysis: Outcome after in situ fixation and capital realignment technique.
Indian journal of orthopaedics
Sanjay Arora, Vivek Dutt, Thomas Palocaren, Vrisha Madhuri
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Paediatric Orthopaedics Unit, Department of Orthopaedics, Christian Medical College, Ida Scudder Road, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
PMID: 23798757
PMCID: PMC3687903 DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.111492
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) is the gradually acquired malalignment of the upper femoral epiphysis (capital) and the proximal femoral metaphysis. SUFE is uncommon in India, and there are no previous studies on outcome and clinical characteristics of patients with SUFE from India. This study evaluates the presentation, disease associations and outcome of SUFE from a tertiary care centre in India.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty six consecutive children with SUFE seen over a period of 4 years were reviewed. The clinical presentations, severity of the slip, surgical interventions (n=30) were assessed. Twenty one boys and five girls with a mean age 13.1 years (range 10-16 years) were included in the study. Four children had bilateral involvement. There were 4 rural and 22 urban children from the eastern and southern states of the country. The presentation was acute in 7, acute on chronic in 5, and chronic in 14, with a mean duration of symptoms of 51 days (range 3-120 days). Slips were stable in 16 and unstable in 10 children. Two children had adiposogenital syndrome. Body mass index was high in 12 out of 23 children. Vitamin D levels were low in 20 out of 21 children, with a mean vitamin D level of 12.61 ± 5 ng/ml. Eighteen children underwent in situ pinning. Eight children underwent capital realignment.
RESULTS: Clinical outcome as assessed by Merle d' Aubigne score was excellent in 6, good in 10, fair in 6 and poor in 1. Half of the in situ fixation patients underwent osteoplasty procedure for femoroacetabular impingement and 5 more were symptomatic. The head neck offset and α angle after in situ pinning were -1.12 ± 3 mm and 66.05 ± 9.7°, respectively and this improved to 8.7 mm and 49°, respectively, after osteoplasty. One child in the pinning group had chondrolysis. Eight patients with severe slip underwent capital realignment. Mean followup was 20.15 months. The anterior head neck offset and α angle were corrected to 6.8 ± 1.72 mm and 44.6 ± 7.0° mm, respectively. Two children with unstable slip in the capital realignment group had avascular necrosis which was diagnosed at presentation by bone scan.
CONCLUSION: High BMI, vitamin D deficiency and endocrine disorders are associated with SUFE in India and should be evaluated as some of these are amenable to prevention and treatment. Most patients treated with in situ pinning developed femoroacetabular impingement. The early results after capital realignment procedure are encouraging and help to avoid a second procedure which is needed in a majority of patients who underwent in situ pinning.
Keywords: Capital realignment; femoroacetabular impingement; modified dunn procedure; slipped upper femoral epiphysis
References
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):692-8 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007 Dec;89(12):1592-6 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975 Jul-Aug;(110):171-3 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954 Jun;36-A(3):451-75 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):704-16 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 1997 Mar-Apr;17(2):216-9 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jan;(322):48-60 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Sep;30(6):544-8 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):157-65 - PubMed
- Lancet. 2004 Jan 10;363(9403):157-63 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2):162-6 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2012 Mar;32(2):125-30 - PubMed
- Clin Dysmorphol. 2011 Jan;20(1):55-57 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 May;84(4):556-60 - PubMed
- J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Nov;19(11):667-77 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2010 Jan-Feb;30(1):26-30 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Jan;90(1):92-4 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992 Jul;74(6):810-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Dec 15;92(18):2898-908 - PubMed
- Iowa Orthop J. 2010;30:191-4 - PubMed
- Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Jun;39(6):533-41 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Aug;75(8):1134-40 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Oct-Nov;28(7):723-8 - PubMed
- Indian J Orthop. 2011 May;45(3):231-5 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):281-8 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):798-801 - PubMed
- J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 May;96(5):1320-6 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2003 Mar-Apr;23(2):169-74 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1977 Jan;59(1):62-8 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1964 Nov;46:621-9 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):694-9 - PubMed
- N Z Med J. 2007 Mar 02;120(1250):U2447 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jan;(322):3-7 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop B. 1996 Spring;5(2):77-9 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Nov;83(8):1119-24 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2001 Sep-Oct;21(5):664-7 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):855-8 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop B. 2011 Sep;20(5):291-4 - PubMed
- Orthopedics. 2010 Dec 01;33(12):921 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012 Jul;21(4):331-4 - PubMed
- J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Jan;97(1):279-85 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 May;93 Suppl 2:46-51 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2011 Apr-May;31(3):254-8 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 1990 May-Jun;10(3):347-50 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2006 Sep-Oct;26(5):594-600 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Sep;58(6):796-800 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 May;91(5):666-9 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Dec;468(12):3160-7 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):535-9 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop B. 2011 May;20(3):147-51 - PubMed
- Instr Course Lect. 2008;57:473-98 - PubMed
- J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967 Jul;49(5):807-35 - PubMed
- J Pediatr Orthop. 1993 May-Jun;13(3):294-302 - PubMed
- Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Jan;(322):8-27 - PubMed
Publication Types