Display options
Share it on

Ann Thorac Med. 2013 Apr;8(2):86-92. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.109818.

Prognostic factors for bronchoscopic intervention in advanced lung or esophageal cancer patients with malignant airway obstruction.

Annals of thoracic medicine

Jae-Uk Song, Hye Yun Park, Hojoong Kim, Kyeongman Jeon, Sang-Won Um, Won-Jung Koh, Gee Young Suh, Man Pyo Chung, O Jung Kwon

Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea ; Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

PMID: 23741270 PMCID: PMC3667451 DOI: 10.4103/1817-1737.109818

Abstract

CONTEXT: Bronchoscopic intervention can provide immediate relief from suffocation and an opportunity for additional treatment in patients with malignant airway obstruction. However, few studies have specifically identified prognostic factors affecting the survival of advanced lung or esophageal cancer patients receiving bronchoscopic intervention.

AIMS: We aimed to investigate prognostic factors influencing survival in these patients.

STUDY DESIGN: We conducted retrospective study.

METHODS: The clinical parameters were retrospectively reviewed in 51 patients (lung cancer: n = 35; esophageal cancer: n = 16) who underwent palliative bronchoscopic interventions due to malignant airway.

RESULTS: Bronchoscopic interventions, such as mechanical removal (n = 26), stenting (n = 31), laser cauterization (n = 19), and ballooning (n = 16), were performed on intraluminal (n = 21, 41%), extrinsic (n = 8, 16%), and combined lesions (n = 22, 43%). Tracheal invasion was found in 24 patients (47%). Successful palliation was achieved in 49 patients (96%). After the intervention, additional anti-cancer treatment was followed in 24 patients (47%). The median survival time and overall survival rate were 3.4 months and 4%. Survival was increased with selected conditions, including a treatment-naïve status (hazard ratio [HR], 0.359; confidence interval [CI], 0.158-0.815; P = 0.01), an intact proximal airway (HR, 0.265; CI, 0.095-0.738; P = 0.01), and post-procedural additional treatment (HR, 0.330; CI, 0.166-0.657; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS: Brochoscopic intervention could provide immediate relief and survival improvement in advanced lung or esophageal cancer patients with selected conditions such as a treatment-naïve status, an intact proximal airway, and available post-procedural additional treatment.

Keywords: Airway obstruction; bronchoscopy; esophageal cancer; lung cancer; survival

References

  1. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2001 Sep;20(3):464-7 - PubMed
  2. J Thorac Oncol. 2009 May;4(5):635-8 - PubMed
  3. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989 Oct;48(4):469-73; discussion 473-5 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1994;8(8):436-41 - PubMed
  5. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Aug;80(2):434-7; discussion 437-8 - PubMed
  6. Surg Clin North Am. 2002 Jun;82(3):621-42 - PubMed
  7. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004 May;15(5):471-7 - PubMed
  8. J Cancer Res Ther. 2010 Apr-Jun;6(2):204-9 - PubMed
  9. Chest. 1996 Dec;110(6):1536-42 - PubMed
  10. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;11(4):425-8 - PubMed
  11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000 Feb;119(2):289-96 - PubMed
  12. Crit Care Med. 1993 Mar;21(3):386-91 - PubMed
  13. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1999 Jun;54(3):264-8 - PubMed
  14. J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Jan;2(1):59-64 - PubMed
  15. Respiration. 2008;76(4):421-8 - PubMed
  16. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Jan;65(1):203-7 - PubMed
  17. J Thorac Oncol. 2006 May;1(4):319-23 - PubMed
  18. Lung Cancer. 2011 May;72(2):244-9 - PubMed
  19. Thorax. 1978 Jun;33(3):387-93 - PubMed
  20. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2001 Nov;11(4):841-60 - PubMed
  21. Surg Today. 2010 Apr;40(4):315-20 - PubMed

Publication Types