Display options
Share it on

Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:675634. doi: 10.1155/2013/675634. Epub 2013 May 27.

The Effect of Face-to-Face Education and Educational Booklet on Heart Health Indexes of the Hospitalized Patients with Myocardial Infarction.

Nursing research and practice

Safar Ali Esmaeili Vardanjani, Laleh Fanisaberi, Firozeh Alirezaee Shahraki, Ahmad Khalilzadeh, Abdolazim Tavakoli Vardanjani, Fatemeh Ghani Dehkordi

Affiliations

  1. Shahrekord University of Medical Science, Shahrekord, Iran.

PMID: 23781336 PMCID: PMC3678501 DOI: 10.1155/2013/675634

Abstract

Management of risk factors and heart health indexes in the patients who have been diagnosed with myocardial infarction will result in prevention of secondary myocardial infarction, reduction of postimprovement mortality, increase of life span and improvement of life quality. Patient education has been found to be one of the most fundamental and essential care programs on the basis of identification and control of the patients' health criteria. The study is a quasi-experimental research consisting of two groups. In this study, 112 patients with myocardial infarction who were below the age of 70 were selected randomly and divided into two groups (case group and control group) after being matched based on age and sex. The researcher first measured the health indexes including smoking, cholesterol level, body mass, level of anxiety, and amount of systolic and diastolic blood pressure in patients who have been diagnosed with myocardial infarction for the first time. He performed education program in case group and analyzed the said variables after four months. He also compared the behaviors in the two groups after being educated. The data was analyzed by SPSS software, version 15 (This product is licensed to FeFDBi, ABiComputer, 1337), and the two groups were compared by using appropriate statistical tests. According to the results, after education period, systolic blood pressure of the case group improves compared with control group (P < 0.05/P = 0.022), case group tends to quit smoking more than control group does (P = 0.013), cholesterol level of case group improves compared with control group (P < 0.0001), changes of body mass are more positive in case group compared with control group (P = 0.012), and anxiety of case group reduces compared with control group (P < 0.0001).

References

  1. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 May 7;41(9):1475-9 - PubMed
  2. Clin Rehabil. 2008 Apr;22(4):329-37 - PubMed
  3. Geriatr Nurs. 2008 Nov-Dec;29(6):392-401 - PubMed
  4. Eur J Intern Med. 2009 May;20(3):280-8 - PubMed
  5. Am Heart J. 2005 Nov;150(5):983 - PubMed
  6. Patient Educ Couns. 2004 Apr;53(1):65-70 - PubMed
  7. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1999 Aug;19(8):1819-24 - PubMed
  8. Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Oct;73(1):67-72 - PubMed
  9. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Nov 24;168(21):2355-61 - PubMed
  10. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2002 Jun;1(2):87-94 - PubMed
  11. Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1298-304 - PubMed
  12. Heart. 1998 Nov;80(5):447-52 - PubMed
  13. Heart. 2000 Jul;84(1):101-5 - PubMed
  14. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 1999 Apr;13(3):60-72 - PubMed
  15. J Intraven Nurs. 1999 Jan-Feb;22(1):19-35 - PubMed
  16. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2008 Dec;38(6):822-30 - PubMed
  17. Lancet. 2008 Sep 6;372(9641):817-21 - PubMed
  18. Rehabil Nurs. 2001 Jul-Aug;26(4):152-8 - PubMed
  19. Clin Rehabil. 2008 Apr;22(4):306-18 - PubMed

Publication Types