Display options
Cite
Eser O, Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, et al. Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:806267doi: 10.1155/2013/806267.
Eser, O., Gomleksiz, C., Sasani, M., Oktenoglu, T., Aydin, A. L., Ataker, Y., Suzer, T., & Ozer, A. F. (2013). Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes. Advances in orthopedics, 2013806267. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/806267
Eser, Olcay, et al. "Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes." Advances in orthopedics vol. 2013 (2013): 806267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/806267
Eser O, Gomleksiz C, Sasani M, Oktenoglu T, Aydin AL, Ataker Y, Suzer T, Ozer AF. Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes. Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:806267. doi: 10.1155/2013/806267. Epub 2013 May 20. PMID: 23781343; PMCID: PMC3671504.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Adv Orthop. 2013;2013:806267. doi: 10.1155/2013/806267. Epub 2013 May 20.

Dynamic stabilisation in the treatment of degenerative disc disease with modic changes.

Advances in orthopedics

Olcay Eser, Cengiz Gomleksiz, Mehdi Sasani, Tunc Oktenoglu, Ahmet Levent Aydin, Yaprak Ataker, Tuncer Suzer, Ali Fahir Ozer

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Afyon Kocatepe University, Afyonkarahisar, Turkey.

PMID: 23781343 PMCID: PMC3671504 DOI: 10.1155/2013/806267

Abstract

Objective. Posterior dynamic stabilization is an effective alternative to fusion in the treatment of chronic instability and degenerative disc disease (DDD) of the lumbar spine. This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2. Modic types 1 and 2 degeneration can be painful. Classic approach in such cases is spine fusion. We operated 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 via posterior dynamic stabilization. Good results were obtained after 2 years of followup. Methods. A total of 88 DDD patients with Modic types 1 and 2 were selected for this study. The patients were included in the study between 2004 and 2010. All of them were examined with lumbar anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-rays. Lordosis of the lumbar spine, segmental lordosis, and ratio of the height of the intervertebral disc spaces (IVSs) were measured preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis was carried out, and according to the data obtained, the grade of disc degeneration was classified. The quality of life and pain scores were evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) preoperatively and at 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Appropriate statistical method was chosen. Results. The mean 3- and 12-month postoperative IVS ratio was significantly greater than that of the preoperative group (P < 0.001). However, the mean 1 and 2 postoperative IVS ratio was not significantly different (P > 0.05). Furthermore, the mean preoperative and 1 and 2 postoperative angles of lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis were not significantly different (P > 0.05). The mean VAS score and ODI, 3, 12, and 24 months after surgery, decreased significantly, when compared with the preoperative scores in the groups (P = 0.000). Conclusion. Dynamic stabilization in chronic degenerative disc disease with Modic types 1 and 2 was effective.

References

  1. Orthopedics. 2007 Oct;30(10):859-65 - PubMed
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 1;28(7):715-20; discussion 721 - PubMed
  3. Eur Spine J. 2006 Sep;15(9):1312-9 - PubMed
  4. Eur Spine J. 1997;6(2):115-20 - PubMed
  5. Open Orthop J. 2010 Mar 04;4:137-41 - PubMed
  6. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 1;32(10):1116-22 - PubMed
  7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4 - PubMed
  8. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;53(3):112-6 - PubMed
  9. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 May 1;20(9):1055-60 - PubMed
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997 Jan;79(1):147-53 - PubMed
  11. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Feb;12(2):183-9 - PubMed
  12. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 20;31(9):1026-31 - PubMed
  13. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul;16(7):925-31 - PubMed
  14. Radiology. 1988 Jul;168(1):177-86 - PubMed
  15. Eur Radiol. 2004 Sep;14(9):1574-81 - PubMed
  16. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2008 Nov;94(7):619-27 - PubMed
  17. J Spinal Disord. 2000 Oct;13(5):438-43 - PubMed
  18. Eur Spine J. 2011 Feb;20(2):297-307 - PubMed
  19. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jul;17(7):834-7 - PubMed
  20. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(5):363-8 - PubMed
  21. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1998 Nov;84(7):583-9 - PubMed
  22. Turk Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;19(4):319-26 - PubMed
  23. Eur Spine J. 2007 Jul;16(7):977-82 - PubMed
  24. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994 Sep;76(5):757-64 - PubMed
  25. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):418-23 - PubMed
  26. Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):352-8 - PubMed
  27. Radiology. 2001 Feb;218(2):420-7 - PubMed
  28. Radiology. 1988 Jan;166(1 Pt 1):193-9 - PubMed
  29. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 15;30(10):1173-80 - PubMed
  30. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Mar 1;30(5):E109-14 - PubMed
  31. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jul 1;31(15):1714-8 - PubMed
  32. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Oct;46(4):322-7 - PubMed
  33. Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Mar;34(3):125-9 - PubMed
  34. Neurol India. 2005 Dec;53(4):466-74 - PubMed
  35. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jun;15(6):581-8 - PubMed
  36. J Spinal Disord. 1996 Oct;9(5):392-400 - PubMed
  37. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987 Sep;149(3):531-4 - PubMed

Publication Types