Display options
Share it on

Psychology (Irvine). 2012 Dec 31;3(12):1153-1160. doi: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A170.

What Reasons Might the Other One Have?-Perspective Taking to Reduce Psychological Reactance in Individualists and Collectivists.

Psychology (Irvine, Calif.)

Christina Steindl, Eva Jonas

Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Social Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

PMID: 23814682 PMCID: PMC3694311 DOI: 10.4236/psych.2012.312A170

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated a considerable amount of negative consequences resulting from psychological reactance. The purpose of this study was to explore opportunities to reduce the amount of reactance. Using the method of perspective taking as an intervention, the current study of 196 Austrians and 198 Filipinos examined whether reactance could be reduced and whether individualists and collectivists differ concerning reactance and their perspective taking abilities. Our results indicated that participants who took the perspective of the person who threatened them experienced less reactance than participants who did not take this approach. This was the case for people from both cultural backgrounds. Nevertheless, comparisons among the two cultural groups yielded different reactions to restrictions. This indicates that individualists are more sensitive to a self-experienced restriction than collectivists, but less sensitive to a restriction of another person. Consequently, we consider culture to be a crucial determinant in predicting the amount of reactance.

Keywords: Collectivists; Individualists; Perspective Taking; Reactance

References

  1. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Apr;100(4):621-9 - PubMed
  2. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Apr;78(4):708-24 - PubMed
  3. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Aug;15(4):283-93 - PubMed
  4. Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 04;6:1052 - PubMed
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Dec;83(6):1344-52 - PubMed
  6. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Sep;73(3):481-94 - PubMed
  7. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Sep;53(3):594-602 - PubMed
  8. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1966 Apr;3(4):420-6 - PubMed
  9. Psychol Sci. 2008 Apr;19(4):378-84 - PubMed
  10. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):857-71 - PubMed
  11. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Apr;70(4):713-26 - PubMed
  12. Pediatrics. 2009 Mar;123(3):870-6 - PubMed
  13. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Aug;73(2):321-36 - PubMed
  14. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(5):872-89 - PubMed
  15. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 Jan;72(1):105-18 - PubMed
  16. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jul;18(7):600-6 - PubMed
  17. Psychol Sci. 2006 Jan;17(1):74-81 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support