Display options
Share it on

Int J Med Educ. 2013;4:26-37. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5103.a8d3.

The undergraduate premedical experience in the United States: a critical review.

International journal of medical education

Katherine Y Lin, Sonali Parnami, Andrea Fuhrel-Forbis, Renee R Anspach, Brett Crawford, Raymond G De Vries

Affiliations

  1. Department of Sociology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

PMID: 23951400 PMCID: PMC3742104 DOI: 10.5116/ijme.5103.a8d3

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the consequences of the premedical years for the character of (future) physicians by critically reviewing the empirical research done on the undergraduate premedical experience in the United States.

METHODS: We searched ERIC, JSTOR, PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and PsycINFO from the earliest available date for empirical, peer-reviewed studies of premedical students in the United States. We then used qualitative methods to uncover overall themes present in this literature.

RESULTS: The initial literature search identified 1,168 articles, 19 of which were included for review. Reviewed articles were published between 1976 and 2010 with the majority published prior to 1990. Articles covered two broad topics: explaining attrition from the premedical track, and investigating the personality traits and stereotypes of premedical students. Self-selection bias and high attrition rates were among the limitations of the reviewed articles.

CONCLUSIONS: There is very little current research on the premedical experience. Given the importance of the premedical years on the process of becoming a medical professional, it is imperative that we do more and better research on how the premedical experience shapes future physicians.

Keywords: Premedical education; attrition from premedical track; hidden curriculum; premedical syndrome; professionalization

References

  1. Psychol Rep. 1976 Aug;39(1):35-45 - PubMed
  2. J Med Educ. 1977 Oct;52(10):849-51 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 2006 Oct 26;355(17):1794-9 - PubMed
  4. Acad Med. 1993 May;68(5):323-8 - PubMed
  5. Med Educ. 1999 Apr;33(4):243-50 - PubMed
  6. Acad Med. 1991 May;66(5):273-8 - PubMed
  7. Acad Med. 2008 May;83(5):503-11 - PubMed
  8. Acad Med. 2010 Feb;85(2):220-7 - PubMed
  9. Acad Med. 2008 Dec;83(12):1158-61 - PubMed
  10. Clin Anat. 2002 Mar;15(2):160-4 - PubMed
  11. J Med Educ. 1984 May;59(5):386-91 - PubMed
  12. Acad Med. 2002 Jul;77(7):719-24 - PubMed
  13. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(2):159-75 - PubMed
  14. Acad Med. 2008 May;83(5):516-20 - PubMed
  15. JAMA. 2006 Sep 6;296(9):1128-31 - PubMed
  16. J Med Educ. 1979 Apr;54(4):308-13 - PubMed
  17. Med Educ. 2008 Sep;42(9):852-3 - PubMed
  18. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2010 Mar;15(1):45-54 - PubMed
  19. Med Educ. 2008 Jun;42(6):572-9 - PubMed
  20. J Med Educ. 1985 Sep;60(9):677-83 - PubMed
  21. Acad Med. 1994 Nov;69(11):861-71 - PubMed
  22. JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2880-9 - PubMed
  23. West J Med. 1996 Mar;164(3):228-30 - PubMed
  24. BMJ. 2006 Apr 29;332(7548):1009-13 - PubMed
  25. Med Educ. 2001 Nov;35(11):1056-64 - PubMed
  26. BMJ. 2002 Apr 20;324(7343):952-7 - PubMed
  27. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(2):135-46 - PubMed
  28. JAMA. 2010 Sep 15;304(11):1181-90 - PubMed
  29. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 5;366(14):1265-8 - PubMed
  30. Acad Med. 1998 Apr;73(4):403-7 - PubMed
  31. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jan 24;312(4):253-6 - PubMed
  32. J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Jun;27(2):150-60 - PubMed
  33. N Engl J Med. 2008 Jul 17;359(3):221-4 - PubMed
  34. Acad Med. 1992 Nov;67(11):783-4 - PubMed
  35. J Med Educ. 1987 Nov;62(11):926-8 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support