Display options
Share it on

Cell Mol Bioeng. 2012;5(1):14-31. doi: 10.1007/s12195-011-0188-5.

Detection of Steps in Single Molecule Data.

Cellular and molecular bioengineering

Tanuj Aggarwal, Donatello Materassi, Robert Davison, Thomas Hays, Murti Salapaka

Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, 200 Union St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

PMID: 23956798 PMCID: PMC3743561 DOI: 10.1007/s12195-011-0188-5

Abstract

Over the past few decades, single molecule investigations employing optical tweezers, AFM and TIRF microscopy have revealed that molecular behaviors are typically characterized by discrete steps or events that follow changes in protein conformation. These events, that manifest as steps or jumps, are short-lived transitions between otherwise more stable molecular states. A major limiting factor in determining the size and timing of the steps is the noise introduced by the measurement system. To address this impediment to the analysis of single molecule behaviors, step detection algorithms incorporate large records of data and provide objective analysis. However, existing algorithms are mostly based on heuristics that are not reliable and lack objectivity. Most of these step detection methods require the user to supply parameters that inform the search for steps. They work well, only when the signal to noise ratio (SNR) is high and stepping speed is low. In this report, we have developed a novel step detection method that performs an objective analysis on the data without input parameters, and based only on the noise statistics. The noise levels and characteristics can be estimated from the data providing reliable results for much smaller SNR and higher stepping speeds. An iterative learning process drives the optimization of step-size distributions for data that has unimodal step-size distribution, and produces extremely low false positive outcomes and high accuracy in finding true steps. Our novel methodology, also uniquely incorporates compensation for the smoothing affects of probe dynamics. A mechanical measurement probe typically takes a finite time to respond to step changes, and when steps occur faster than the probe response time, the sharp step transitions are smoothed out and can obscure the step events. To address probe dynamics we accept a model for the dynamic behavior of the probe and invert it to reveal the steps. No other existing method addresses the impact of probe dynamics on step detection. Importantly, we have also developed a comprehensive set of tools to evaluate various existing step detection techniques. We quantify the performance and limitations of various step detection methods using novel evaluation scales. We show that under these scales, our method provides much better overall performance. The method is validated on different simulated test cases, as well as experimental data.

Keywords: Dwell time sequence; Molecular motors; Step detection

References

  1. Nat Cell Biol. 2001 Apr;3(4):425-8 - PubMed
  2. Biophys J. 2007 May 1;92(9):2986-95 - PubMed
  3. J Cell Biol. 1998 Mar 23;140(6):1395-405 - PubMed
  4. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Oct;10(10):682-96 - PubMed
  5. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 16;98(2):468-72 - PubMed
  6. Neural Comput. 1998 Oct 1;10(7):1679-703 - PubMed
  7. Rev Sci Instrum. 2009 Aug;80(8):084301 - PubMed
  8. Annu Rev Biochem. 2008;77:205-28 - PubMed
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 5;93(5):1913-7 - PubMed
  10. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000 Jun 7;272(2):586-90 - PubMed
  11. Biosci Rep. 1992 Aug;12(4):237-62 - PubMed
  12. J Cell Biol. 1995 Oct;131(2):411-25 - PubMed
  13. Cell. 1985 Aug;42(1):39-50 - PubMed
  14. Nature. 1993 Oct 21;365(6448):721-7 - PubMed
  15. Biophys J. 2002 Jul;83(1):491-501 - PubMed
  16. Science. 2004 Mar 12;303(5664):1674-8 - PubMed
  17. ACS Chem Biol. 2007 Jan 23;2(1):53-61 - PubMed
  18. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2004 Feb;14(1):76-88 - PubMed
  19. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 15;97(17):9482-6 - PubMed
  20. Nat Struct Biol. 2000 Sep;7(9):715-8 - PubMed
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 2;104(1):87-92 - PubMed
  22. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009 Jun 28;11(24):4899-910 - PubMed
  23. Rev Sci Instrum. 2010 Dec;81(12):123105 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support