Display options
Share it on

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2012 Aug;73(4):236-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312712. Epub 2012 May 25.

Value of free-run electromyographic monitoring of lower cranial nerves in endoscopic endonasal approach to skull base surgeries.

Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base

Parthasarathy D Thirumala, Santhosh Kumar Mohanraj, Miguel Habeych, Kelley Wichman, Yue-Fang Chang, Paul Gardner, Carl Snyderman, Donald J Crammond, Jeffrey Balzer

Affiliations

  1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States ; Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.

PMID: 23904999 PMCID: PMC3424031 DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312712

Abstract

Objective The main objective of this study was to evaluate the value of free-run electromyography (f-EMG) monitoring of cranial nerves (CNs) VII, IX, X, XI, and XII in skull base surgeries performed using endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to reduce iatrogenic CN deficits. Design We retrospectively identified 73 patients out of 990 patients who had EEA in our institution who had at least one CN monitored. In each CN group, we classified patients who had significant (SG) f-EMG activity as group I and those who did not as group II. Results We monitored a total of 342 CNs. A total of 62 nerves had SG f-EMG activity including CN VII = 18, CN IX = 16, CN X = 13, CN XI = 5, and CN XII = 10. No nerve deficit was found in the nerves that had significant activity during procedure. A total of five nerve deficits including (CN IX = 1, CN X = 2, CN XII = 2) were observed in the group that did not display SG f-EMG activity during surgery. Conclusions f-EMG seems highly sensitive to surgical manipulations and in locating CNs. It seems to have limited value in predicting postoperative neurological deficits. Future studies to evaluate the EMG of lower CNs during EEA procedures need to be done with both f-EMG and triggered EMG.

Keywords: electromyography; endoscopic endonasal approach; lower cranial nerves; skull base surgery

References

  1. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E4 - PubMed
  2. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun;132(6):624-8 - PubMed
  3. Mayo Clin Proc. 1987 Feb;62(2):92-102 - PubMed
  4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005 Dec;133(6):906-10 - PubMed
  5. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1998;140(3):235-42; discussion 242-3 - PubMed
  6. Neurol Res. 1999 Jan;21(1):11-24 - PubMed
  7. Ann Surg. 2004 Jul;240(1):9-17 - PubMed
  8. Neurosurg Rev. 2008 Jan;31(1):45-53 - PubMed
  9. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2001 Jul;103(2):72-82 - PubMed
  10. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E3 - PubMed
  11. Muscle Nerve. 2004 Mar;29(3):339-51 - PubMed
  12. Neurosurgery. 1993 Feb;32(2):227-35; discussion 235 - PubMed
  13. Muscle Nerve. 1995 Feb;18(2):236-8 - PubMed
  14. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Dec;97(6):541-51 - PubMed
  15. Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons64-76; discussion ons76 - PubMed
  16. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E8 - PubMed
  17. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jul;147(7):697-706; discussion 706 - PubMed
  18. Neurosurgery. 1986 Sep;19(3):392-400 - PubMed
  19. Neurosurgery. 2005 Jul;57(1 Suppl):E213; discussion E213 - PubMed
  20. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jul 15;19(1):E6 - PubMed
  21. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2001;143(3):251-61 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosurg. 2000 Oct;93(4):586-93 - PubMed
  23. J Neurosurg. 2008 Jul;109(1):6-16 - PubMed
  24. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Jan;26(1):114-20 - PubMed
  25. J Neurosurg. 2005 Apr;102(4):643-9 - PubMed
  26. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Jul;26(4):728-32 - PubMed
  27. Am J Otol. 1998 Jan;19(1):112-7 - PubMed
  28. Otol Neurotol. 2005 Mar;26(2):270-3 - PubMed
  29. Skull Base Surg. 1995;5(4):245-50 - PubMed

Publication Types