Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.014. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
Discordance between patient report and chart review of risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in ED patients.
The American journal of emergency medicine
Jeffrey M Caterino, Lauren Graham, Andrew King, Tyler Hoppes
Affiliations
Affiliations
- Department of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].
PMID: 23906619
PMCID: PMC4065240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.014
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to identify the level of agreement between patient self-report and chart review for presence of antimicrobial resistance (AR) risk factors in emergency department (ED) patients.
METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of adult ED patients from July 2010 to January 2011. All ED patients 18 years or older were eligible. Exclusion criteria included pregnant women, prisoners, altered mental status, non-English speakers, traumas, and patients unable to provide consent. Data were obtained by ED patient interview and review of the preceding 3 months of the medical record. We report the difference between patient self-report and chart review of identifying 1 or more AR risk factors using McNemar's χ(2). The test statistic was also calculated for individual risk factors and significance adjusted for multiple comparisons (P < .003). Agreement was calculated using κ with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk factor domains assessed included nursing home residence, recent health care utilization, current indwelling devices, and medical history.
RESULTS: Among 289 patients, 1 or more risk factors were reported by 68% (95% CI, 63%-74%) of patients and found in 59% (95% CI, 53%-65%) of charts, a difference of 9.7% (95% CI, 5.3%-14%) (P < .001; κ = 0.72). Patients were more likely to report recent antibiotic use (42% vs 29%; P < .001; κ = 0.52) and recent surgery (17% vs 11%; P < .001; κ = 0.64).
CONCLUSIONS: There is disagreement between ED patient self-report and medical record review for many AR risk factors. This could affect both clinical care and results of ED research studies relying on chart reviews. Patient self-report identifies a greater number of AR risk factors than chart review.
© 2013.
References
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 Oct;57(10):1096-103 - PubMed
- J Manag Care Pharm. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):17-25 - PubMed
- Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Mar 1;44 Suppl 2:S27-72 - PubMed
- Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005 Feb 15;171(4):388-416 - PubMed
- Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):2987-94 - PubMed
- Am J Emerg Med. 2000 Mar;18(2):143-6 - PubMed
- Chest. 2008 Nov;134(5):963-968 - PubMed
- Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Nov;88(5):668-75 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;56(2):148-54 - PubMed
- Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327 - PubMed
- Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
- Am J Cardiol. 2011 Feb 15;107(4):569-72 - PubMed
- Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 May;19(5):474-81 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-9 - PubMed
- Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Apr;14 Suppl 3:15-21 - PubMed
- Am J Manag Care. 2007 Jun;13(6 Part 1):289-96 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):1073-9 - PubMed
- Med Care. 2006 Feb;44(2):132-40 - PubMed
- Br J Hosp Med. 1993 Mar 3-16;49(5):346-50 - PubMed
- Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):813-8 - PubMed
- Clin Infect Dis. 1999 Oct;29(4):745-58 - PubMed
- J Hosp Infect. 2007 Apr;65(4):361-7 - PubMed
- J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Jul;57(7):1219-25 - PubMed
- J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Jun;60(6):634-42 - PubMed
- Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):462-74 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Publication Types
Grant support