Display options
Share it on

GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013 Apr 29;8(1):Doc02. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000202. eCollection 2013.

Bacteriology swabs in primary total knee arthroplasty.

GMS hygiene and infection control

Maximilian Haenle, Andreas Podbielski, Martin Ellenrieder, Andreas Mundt, Helga Krentz, Wolfram Mittelmeier, Ralf Skripitz

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Medicine Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

PMID: 23967388 PMCID: PMC3746596 DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000202

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An early detection of possible periprosthetic infection may lead to an earlier and potentially less invasive treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty TKA). The purpose of the present study was to evaluate retrospectively our current, affordable clinical practice of intra-operative swab taking during primary TKA.

METHODS: A total of 206 primary TKA were analysed retrospectively for intra-operative bacteriology swabs and subsequent periprosthetic infection. All bacteriology swabs were obtained in a standardized manner including a tissue sample. Data was statistically evaluated concerning standard descriptive statistics and using the chi-square test.

RESULTS: Bacteria were identified in 43.4% with coagulase-negative staphylococci being the most frequently isolated pathogens (52.2%). Regarding the contingency tables and chi-squared tests, generally no association was found between positive intra-operative swabs and subsequent periprosthetic infection as well as all other parameters investigated (timing of the antibiotic prophylaxis and pre-operative laboratory results).

CONCLUSIONS: Bacteriology swabs during primary total knee arthroplasty are no adequate measure to predict subsequent periprosthetic infections, even if augmented with a tissue sample.

Keywords: intra-operative bacteriology swab; intra-operative tissue sample; peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis; periprosthetic infection; pre-operative laboratory infection markers; total knee arthroplasty

References

  1. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991 Sep;73(8):1200-7 - PubMed
  2. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jun;25(6):512-4 - PubMed
  3. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 14;351(16):1645-54 - PubMed
  4. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 1997 Sep;26(9):617-20 - PubMed
  5. GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip. 2011;6(1):Doc17 - PubMed
  6. J Infect Dis. 1988 Jul;158(1):203-5 - PubMed
  7. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan;91(1):38-47 - PubMed
  8. Acta Orthop Scand. 1976 Jun;47(3):320-3 - PubMed
  9. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 Dec;35(12):3367-8 - PubMed
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Sep;81(5):886-9 - PubMed
  11. Orthopade. 2012 Jan;41(1):15-9 - PubMed
  12. Knee. 2009 Aug;16(4):262-4 - PubMed
  13. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jan;(382):222-31 - PubMed
  14. J Clin Microbiol. 1997 May;35(5):1269-71 - PubMed
  15. J Arthroplasty. 2010 Jan;25(1):87-92 - PubMed
  16. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Dec;62(4):471-3 - PubMed
  17. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:196515 - PubMed
  18. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Aug;64(4):417-20 - PubMed
  19. Scand J Infect Dis. 2009;41(11-12):831-40 - PubMed
  20. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1993;82(1):51-4 - PubMed
  21. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973 Sep;55(6):1242-50 - PubMed
  22. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996 Oct;78(10):1553-8 - PubMed
  23. Orthopade. 2004 Dec;33(12):1411-26; 1427-8 - PubMed
  24. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90(2):226-32 - PubMed

Publication Types