Display options
Share it on

Front Zool. 2013 Sep 06;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-53.

A detailed description of the development of the hemichordate Saccoglossus kowalevskii using SEM, TEM, Histology and 3D-reconstructions.

Frontiers in zoology

Sabrina Kaul-Strehlow, Thomas Stach

Affiliations

  1. Department für Integrative Zoologie, Universität Wien, Althanstr, 14, 1090, Wien, Austria. [email protected].

PMID: 24010725 PMCID: PMC4081662 DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-53

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, the origin of the third germ layer and its special formation of coelomic cavities by enterocoely is regarded to be an informative character in phylogenetic analyses. In early deuterostomes such as sea urchins, the mesoderm forms through a single evagination pinching off from the apical end of the archenteron which then gives off mesocoela and metacoela on each side. This echinoid-type coelom formation has conventionally been assumed to be ancestral for Deuterostomia. However, recent phylogenetic analyses show that Echinodermata hold a more derived position within Deuterostomia. In this regard a subgroup of Hemichordata, namely enteropneusts, seem to host promising candidates, because they are supposed to have retained many ancestral deuterostome features on the one hand, and furthermore share some characteristics with chordates on the other hand. In enteropneusts a wide range of different modes of coelom formation has been reported and in many cases authors of the original observations carefully detailed the limitations of their descriptions, while these doubts disappeared in subsequent reviews. In the present study, we investigated the development of all tissues in an enteropneust, Saccoglossus kowalevskii by using modern morphological techniques such as complete serial sectioning for LM and TEM, and 3D-reconstructions, in order to contribute new data to the elucidation of deuterostome evolution.

RESULTS: Our data show that in the enteropneust S. kowalevskii all main coelomic cavities (single protocoel, paired mesocoela and metacoela) derive from the endoderm via enterocoely as separate evaginations, in contrast to the aforementioned echinoid-type. The anlagen of the first pair of gill slits emerge at the late kink stage (~96 h pf). From that time onwards, we documented a temporal left-first development of the gill slits and skeletal gill rods in S. kowalevskii until the 2 gill slit juvenile stage.

CONCLUSIONS: The condition of coelom formation from separate evaginations is recapitulated in the larva of amphioxus and can be observed in crinoid echinoderms in a similar way. Therefore, coelom formation from separated pouches, rather than from a single apical pouch with eventual subdivision is suggested as the ancestral type of coelom formation for Deuterostomia. Left-right asymmetries are also present in echinoderms (rudiment formation), cephalochordates (larval development), tunicates (gut coiling) and vertebrates (visceral organs), and it is known from other studies applying molecular genetic analyses that genes such as nodal, lefty and pitx are involved during development. We discuss our findings in S. kowalevskii in the light of morphological as well as molecular genetic data.

References

  1. Nature. 2006 Nov 2;444(7115):85-8 - PubMed
  2. Mech Dev. 2005 Jan;122(1):3-25 - PubMed
  3. Dev Dyn. 2005 Oct;234(2):269-78 - PubMed
  4. Rouxs Arch Dev Biol. 1994 Aug;203(7-8):357-366 - PubMed
  5. Dev Dyn. 2011 Nov;240(11):2432-9 - PubMed
  6. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2009 Jul;52(1):17-24 - PubMed
  7. Curr Biol. 2004 Apr 6;14(7):R274-6 - PubMed
  8. Bioessays. 2002 Nov;24(11):1004-11 - PubMed
  9. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):255-8 - PubMed
  10. Dev Biol. 2005 Jun 1;282(1):14-26 - PubMed
  11. PLoS Biol. 2006 Sep;4(9):e291 - PubMed
  12. Development. 1990 May;109(1):1-9 - PubMed
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 25;97(9):4469-74 - PubMed
  14. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2008 Jan 15;310(1):41-53 - PubMed
  15. Int J Dev Biol. 2003;47(7-8):531-9 - PubMed
  16. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 27;363(1496):1569-78 - PubMed
  17. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2008 Jan 15;310(1):5-14 - PubMed
  18. Methods Cell Biol. 2004;74:171-94 - PubMed
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Apr 22;279(1733):1646-54 - PubMed
  20. Science. 2004 Oct 29;306(5697):828-33 - PubMed
  21. Dev Cell. 2005 Jul;9(1):147-58 - PubMed
  22. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e48529 - PubMed
  23. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1115-23 - PubMed
  24. Dev Dyn. 2008 Dec;237(12):3634-9 - PubMed
  25. Development. 2004 May;131(10):2463-74 - PubMed
  26. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1995 Mar;4(1):72-6 - PubMed
  27. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 27;363(1496):1557-68 - PubMed
  28. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Dec 22;276(1677):4261-70 - PubMed
  29. Zoolog Sci. 2004 May;21(5):533-40 - PubMed
  30. Genesis. 2008 Nov;46(11):605-13 - PubMed
  31. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2013 Sep;320(6):368-74 - PubMed

Publication Types