Display options
Cite
da Silva RP, Novaes J, Oliveira RJ, et al. High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response. J Sports Sci Med. 2007;6(4):560-7
da Silva, R. P., Novaes, J., Oliveira, R. J., Gentil, P., Wagner, D., & Bottaro, M. (2007). High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response. Journal of sports science & medicine, 6(4), 560-7.
da Silva, Rodrigo P, et al. "High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response." Journal of sports science & medicine vol. 6,4 (2007): 560-7.
da Silva RP, Novaes J, Oliveira RJ, Gentil P, Wagner D, Bottaro M. High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response. J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Dec 01;6(4):560-7. eCollection 2007. PMID: 24149492; PMCID: PMC3794499.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Sports Sci Med. 2007 Dec 01;6(4):560-7. eCollection 2007.

High-velocity resistance exercise protocols in older women: effects on cardiovascular response.

Journal of sports science & medicine

Rodrigo P da Silva, Jefferson Novaes, Ricardo J Oliveira, Paulo Gentil, Dale Wagner, Martim Bottaro

Affiliations

  1. College of Physical Education, Faculdades Unidas do Norte de Minas , Brazil ; Graduate School of Physical Education, Catholic University of Brasilia , Brazil.

PMID: 24149492 PMCID: PMC3794499

Abstract

Acute cardiovascular responses to different high-velocity resistance exercise protocols were compared in untrained older women. Twelve apparently healthy volunteers (62.6 ± 2.9 y) performed three different protocols in the bench press (BP). All protocols involved three sets of 10 repetitions performed with a 10RM load and 2 minutes of rest between sets. The continuous protocol (CP) involved ten repetitions with no pause between repetitions. The discontinuous protocols were performed with a pause of five (DP5) or 15 (DP15) seconds between the fifth and sixth repetitions. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rate pressure product (RPP), Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE), and blood lactate (BLa) were assessed at baseline and at the end of all exercise sets. Factorial ANOVA was used to compare the cardiovascular response among different protocols. Compared to baseline, HR and RPP were significantly (p < 0.05) higher after the third set in all protocols. HR and RPP were significantly (p < 0.05) lower in DP5 and DP15 compared with CP for the BP exercise. Compared to baseline, RPE increased significantly (p < 0.05) with each subsequent set in all protocols. Blood lactate concentration during DP5 and DP15 was significantly lower than CP. It appears that discontinuous high-velocity resistance exercise has a lower cardiovascular demand than continuous resistance exercise in older women. Key pointsThe assessment of cardiovascular responses to high-velocity resistance exercise in older individuals is very important for exercise prescription and rehabilitation in elderly population.Discontinuous protocol decrease myocardial oxygen consumption (HR x SBP) during the performance of dynamic high-velocity resistance exercise in older women.The decrease in RPP (~ 8.5%) during the discontinuous protocol has clinical implications when developing high-velocity resistance exercise strategies for elderly individuals.

Keywords: Aging; blood pressure; heart rate; perceived exertion; weight training

References

  1. Can J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;28(2):178-89 - PubMed
  2. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Feb;34(2):364-80 - PubMed
  3. Circ Res. 1981 Jun;48(6 Pt 2):I70-5 - PubMed
  4. J Strength Cond Res. 2003 May;17(2):334-7 - PubMed
  5. J Appl Physiol. 1972 Apr;32(4):516-22 - PubMed
  6. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Apr;90(4):1497-507 - PubMed
  7. Circulation. 1993 Nov;88(5 Pt 1):2460-70 - PubMed
  8. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:11-6 - PubMed
  9. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Jan;31(1):31-7 - PubMed
  10. Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Jul;66(1):192-6 - PubMed
  11. J Appl Physiol. 1975 Jan;38(1):91-5 - PubMed
  12. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2090-7 - PubMed
  13. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2003 Feb;58(2):171-5 - PubMed
  14. Circulation. 1978 Mar;57(3):549-56 - PubMed
  15. J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:45-54 - PubMed
  16. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Aug;34(8):1367-75 - PubMed
  17. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006 Apr;31(2):87-94 - PubMed
  18. Am J Hypertens. 1999 Feb;12(2 Pt 2):50S-55S - PubMed
  19. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1998 Apr;77(5):439-44 - PubMed
  20. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Aug;91(2):569-80 - PubMed
  21. Circulation. 1974 Dec;50(6):1179-89 - PubMed
  22. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Feb;99(3):257-64 - PubMed
  23. Clin Sci. 1964 Oct;27:229-44 - PubMed
  24. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Feb;35(2):333-41 - PubMed
  25. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1989 Sep;29(3):262-8 - PubMed
  26. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1990 Apr;22(2):141-54 - PubMed
  27. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Apr 15;147(8):755-63 - PubMed
  28. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Feb;79(3):260-7 - PubMed
  29. Gerontology. 2005 Mar-Apr;51(2):108-15 - PubMed
  30. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992 Oct;73(4):1590-7 - PubMed
  31. J Hypertens Suppl. 1991 Dec;9(8):S10-2 - PubMed
  32. Circulation. 2007 Jul 31;116(5):572-84 - PubMed
  33. Can J Appl Physiol. 1994 Mar;19(1):60-74 - PubMed
  34. Nutr Rev. 2003 May;61(5 Pt 1):157-67 - PubMed
  35. Can J Appl Physiol. 2002 Jun;27(3):213-31 - PubMed
  36. Gerontology. 1988;34(4):165-70 - PubMed
  37. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jul;63(1):116-20 - PubMed
  38. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Jul;82(7):872-8 - PubMed
  39. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995 Nov;50 Spec No:107-12 - PubMed
  40. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Apr;50(4):655-62 - PubMed
  41. Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Jan;171(1):51-62 - PubMed
  42. Fed Proc. 1985 Apr;44(7):2271-8 - PubMed
  43. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006 Sep;26(5):305-13 - PubMed
  44. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 2;136(7):493-503 - PubMed
  45. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1995 Oct;43(10):1081-7 - PubMed

Publication Types