Display options
Share it on

Alcohol Treat Q. 2013 Jan 01;31(4):431-449. doi: 10.1080/07347324.2013.831671.

Does Mandated Treatment Benefit Youth? A Prospective Investigation of Adolescent Justice System Involvement, Treatment Motivation, and Substance Use Outcomes.

Alcoholism treatment quarterly

Julie D Yeterian, M Claire Greene, Brandon G Bergman, John F Kelly

Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Center for Addiction Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114.

PMID: 24159252 PMCID: PMC3804375 DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2013.831671

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of adolescents treated for substance use disorder (SUD) in the United States are now referred by the criminal justice system. Little is known, however, regarding how justice-system involvement relates to adolescent community treatment outcomes. Controversy exists, also, over the extent to which justice system involvement reflects a lack of intrinsic motivation for treatment. This study examined the relation between justice system referral and reported reason for treatment entry and tested the extent to which each predicted treatment response and outcome.

METHOD: Adolescent outpatients (

RESULTS: JSI-M were less likely to be self-motivated compared to No-JSI or JSI (

CONCLUSIONS: Mandated adolescent outpatients were substantially less likely to report self-motivated treatment entry. Despite the notion that self-motivated treatment entry would be likely to produce better outcomes, a judicial mandate appears to predict an initially stronger treatment response, although this diminishes over time. Ongoing monitoring and/or treatment may be necessary to help maintain treatment gains for justice system-involved adolescents.

Keywords: adolescent; justice system; mandated treatment; motivation; substance use disorder; treatment

References

  1. Psychol Addict Behav. 2002 Jun;16(2):165-8 - PubMed
  2. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005 Apr;28(3):213-23 - PubMed
  3. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000 Jan;39(1):28-38 - PubMed
  4. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011 Nov 1;118(2-3):400-7 - PubMed
  5. J Stud Alcohol. 1998 Jul;59(4):427-38 - PubMed
  6. J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 1994 Dec;12:112-8 - PubMed
  7. Psychol Med. 1983 Aug;13(3):595-605 - PubMed
  8. Addiction. 1995 May;90(5):627-35 - PubMed
  9. Addiction. 1995 Sep;90(9):1223-40 - PubMed
  10. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2009 Apr;36(2):159-76 - PubMed
  11. Addict Behav. 2002 Mar-Apr;27(2):179-92 - PubMed
  12. Addict Behav. 1989;14(3):291-300 - PubMed
  13. Eur Addict Res. 2006;12(4):197-209 - PubMed
  14. Addiction. 2002 Dec;97 Suppl 1:46-57 - PubMed
  15. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005 Oct 1;80(1):63-81 - PubMed
  16. Int J Addict. 1988 Jan;23(1):65-85 - PubMed
  17. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012 Jul;43(1):70-9 - PubMed
  18. Harm Reduct J. 2010 Jun 20;7:13 - PubMed
  19. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1999 Nov;25(4):573-91 - PubMed
  20. Health Soc Work. 2007 Feb;32(1):7-15 - PubMed
  21. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(1):2-22 - PubMed
  22. Addiction. 2006 Jan;101(1):40-9 - PubMed
  23. Subst Use Misuse. 2012 Sep;47(11):1224-33 - PubMed
  24. Addict Behav. 2006 Oct;31(10):1858-72 - PubMed
  25. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2008 Jan 1;92(1-3):123-31 - PubMed
  26. Subst Use Misuse. 2005;40(12):1777-95 - PubMed
  27. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 1993;19(1):89-106 - PubMed

Publication Types

Grant support