Display options
Share it on

Planta. 1988 Jun;174(3):333-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00959518.

Physical properties of the cell wall of photoautotrophic suspension cells fromChenopodium rubrum L.

Planta

J P Gogarten

Affiliations

  1. Botanisches Institut I der Justus Liebig Universität Giessen, Senckenbergstrasse 17, D-6300, Giessen, Federal Republic of Germany.

PMID: 24221514 DOI: 10.1007/BF00959518

Abstract

Photoautotrophic suspension cells ofChenopodium rubrum were used to determine Donnan potential, charge density and pore-radius distribution in the cell wall. Experiments were done either with turgescent cells or with isolated cell walls. Titration of a cell-wall-generated 9-aminoacridine fluorescence quench with salts of mono- and divalent cations was used to determine Donnan potential and charge density. The experiments and theory were adapted from measurements of membrane surface charges. A tenfold increase in ionic strength, which decreases the repellant forces between charges of the same sign, led to an approximately threefold increase in the measured charge density, thus resulting in a much smaller decrease of the Donnan potential than would be expected if the charge density remained fixed. This decreased influence of ionic strength on the Donnan potential, resulting from the elasticity of the cell wall, was also measurable but less pronounced when the wall of intact cells was stretched by turgor. The porosity of the cell wall was determined by longterm uptake of polyethylene glycols of different molecular weights, and by gel filtration of polyethylene glycols and dextrans as well as mono- and disaccharides using intact suspension cells as matrix. Both methods gave a mean pore diameter of about 4.5 nm and a maximum pore size of 5.5 nm. The resulting pores-size distribution was slightly broader with the latter method.

References

  1. Plant Physiol. 1984 Sep;76(1):201-4 - PubMed
  2. Science. 1982 Nov 19;218(4574):813-4 - PubMed
  3. Science. 1979 Sep 14;205(4411):1144-7 - PubMed
  4. J Chromatogr. 1972 Jun 28;69(1):209-14 - PubMed
  5. Planta. 1987 May;171(1):43-57 - PubMed
  6. Plant Physiol. 1973 Jan;51(1):158-73 - PubMed
  7. Planta. 1981 Jan;151(1):95-102 - PubMed
  8. Planta. 1984 Dec;162(6):481-6 - PubMed
  9. J Plant Physiol. 1985 Mar;118(4):309-25 - PubMed
  10. Planta. 1981 Jan;151(1):88-94 - PubMed
  11. Science. 1981 Aug 14;213(4509):761-3 - PubMed
  12. Eur J Cell Biol. 1984 May;34(1):212-6 - PubMed

Publication Types