Display options
Cite
Barber SM, Rangel-Castilla L, Baskin D. Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:898753doi: 10.1155/2013/898753.
Barber, S. M., Rangel-Castilla, L., & Baskin, D. (2013). Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis. Minimally invasive surgery, 2013898753. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/898753
Barber, Sean M, et al. "Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis." Minimally invasive surgery vol. 2013 (2013): 898753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/898753
Barber SM, Rangel-Castilla L, Baskin D. Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis. Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:898753. doi: 10.1155/2013/898753. Epub 2013 Sep 26. PMID: 24191196; PMCID: PMC3804403.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:898753. doi: 10.1155/2013/898753. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

Neuroendoscopic resection of intraventricular tumors: a systematic outcomes analysis.

Minimally invasive surgery

Sean M Barber, Leonardo Rangel-Castilla, David Baskin

Affiliations

  1. Houston Methodist Neurological Institute, Department of Neurological Surgery, Suite 944, 6560 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

PMID: 24191196 PMCID: PMC3804403 DOI: 10.1155/2013/898753

Abstract

Introduction. Though traditional microsurgical techniques are the gold standard for intraventricular tumor resection, the morbidity and invasiveness of microsurgical approaches to the ventricular system have galvanized interest in neuroendoscopic resection. We present a systematic review of the literature to provide a better understanding of the virtues and limitations of endoscopic tumor resection. Materials and Methods. 40 articles describing 668 endoscopic tumor resections were selected from the Pubmed database and reviewed. Results. Complete or near-complete resection was achieved in 75.0% of the patients. 9.9% of resected tumors recurred during the follow-up period, and procedure-related complications occurred in 20.8% of the procedures. Tumor size ≤ 2cm (P = 0.00146), the presence of a cystic tumor component (P < 0.0001), and the use of navigation or stereotactic tools during the procedure (P = 0.0003) were each independently associated with a greater likelihood of complete or near-complete tumor resection. Additionally, the complication rate was significantly higher for noncystic masses than for cystic ones (P < 0.0001). Discussion. Neuroendoscopic outcomes for intraventricular tumor resection are significantly better when performed on small, cystic tumors and when neural navigation or stereotaxy is used. Conclusion. Neuroendoscopic resection appears to be a safe and reliable treatment option for patients with intraventricular tumors of a particular morphology.

References

  1. Neurosurgery. 2003 Mar;52(3):525-33; discussion 532-3 - PubMed
  2. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Nov;154(11):1951-60 - PubMed
  3. World Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S14.e23-8 - PubMed
  4. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 Apr;153(4):773-84 - PubMed
  5. Neurosurg Rev. 2012 Jul;35(3):351-8 - PubMed
  6. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2004 Aug;146(8):785-802 - PubMed
  7. Neurosurgery. 2008 Mar;62(3 Suppl 1):51-5; discussion 55-6 - PubMed
  8. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(2):105-7 - PubMed
  9. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(2 Suppl Operative):ons176-82; discussion ons182-3 - PubMed
  10. Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb;66(2):368-74; discussion 374-5 - PubMed
  11. J Neurosurg. 1994 Aug;81(2):174-8 - PubMed
  12. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1042-8 - PubMed
  13. Childs Nerv Syst. 1994 Apr;10(3):162-6 - PubMed
  14. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2001 Sep;44(3):121-7 - PubMed
  15. J Neurosurg. 2009 Jan;110(1):112-5 - PubMed
  16. Neurosurgery. 2006 Feb;58(1 Suppl):ONS166-9; discussion ONS166-9 - PubMed
  17. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2003 Aug;46(4):215-9 - PubMed
  18. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2013 Jan;155(1):135-8 - PubMed
  19. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2011 Jan;7(1):104-10 - PubMed
  20. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2009 May-Jun;43(3):251-7 - PubMed
  21. World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):498-9 - PubMed
  22. J Neurosurg. 2001 Jan;94(1):72-9 - PubMed
  23. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2003 Oct;14(4):547-57 - PubMed
  24. Turk Neurosurg. 2008 Oct;18(4):345-55 - PubMed
  25. Neurosurg Rev. 2008 Jul;31(3):249-62 - PubMed
  26. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jun 15;18(6A):E1 - PubMed
  27. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 May;145(5):369-75; discussion 375-6 - PubMed
  28. Neurosurgery. 2000 Mar;46(3):655-60; discussion 660-2 - PubMed
  29. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;112(5):400-5 - PubMed
  30. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Oct;22(10):1263-7 - PubMed
  31. World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):655.e15-21 - PubMed
  32. J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2):271-8 - PubMed
  33. Br J Neurosurg. 2002 Oct;16(5):465-70 - PubMed
  34. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2012 Jul-Aug;46(4):333-43 - PubMed
  35. Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Sep;27(9):1489-92 - PubMed
  36. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1995 Jun;38(2):79-84 - PubMed
  37. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2004 Jan;15(1):89-103 - PubMed
  38. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 1997 Dec;40(4):139-43 - PubMed
  39. Neurochirurgie. 2000 Jun;46(3):211-38 - PubMed
  40. Am J Surg Pathol. 2012 Feb;36(2):220-7 - PubMed
  41. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007 Dec;50(6):313-7 - PubMed
  42. Neurosurgery. 2002 Dec;51(6):1441-4; discussion 1444-5 - PubMed
  43. J Clin Neurosci. 2001 Jul;8(4):328-31 - PubMed
  44. Neurosurgery. 2010 Dec;67(6):1483-96; discussion 1496 - PubMed
  45. Neurol India. 2010 May-Jun;58(3):412-7 - PubMed
  46. Neurosurgery. 2010 Mar;66(3 Suppl Operative):65-74 - PubMed
  47. Neurosurgery. 2011 Jan;68(1):179-87 - PubMed
  48. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Aug;22(8):874-80 - PubMed
  49. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;68(1-4 Pt 1):80-9 - PubMed
  50. Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E6 - PubMed
  51. Can J Neurol Sci. 2007 May;34(2):197-207 - PubMed
  52. Neurosurg Focus. 2005 Jun 15;18(6A):E3 - PubMed
  53. J Neurosurg. 2012 Aug;117(2):255-61 - PubMed
  54. J Neurosurg. 1997 Jan;86(1):5-12 - PubMed
  55. Neurosurgery. 1999 May;44(5):1103-9; discussion 1109-11 - PubMed
  56. J Clin Neurosci. 2013 Jan;20(1):89-93 - PubMed
  57. J Neurosurg. 1998 Mar;88(3):496-505 - PubMed
  58. Neurosurg Rev. 1998;21(2-3):126-37 - PubMed
  59. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1992;116(2-4):128-36 - PubMed
  60. Surg Neurol. 2002 May;57(5):295-302; discussion 302-4 - PubMed
  61. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2000;75(2-3):133-41 - PubMed
  62. Neurosurg Rev. 2009 Oct;32(4):395-402 - PubMed
  63. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Feb;3(2):81-9 - PubMed
  64. J Neurosurg. 1998 Dec;89(6):1062-8 - PubMed
  65. Neurosurgery. 2008 Feb;62 Suppl 2:575-97; discussion 597-8 - PubMed
  66. J Korean Med Sci. 2005 Apr;20(2):335-9 - PubMed
  67. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Feb;16(2):312-6 - PubMed
  68. World Neurosurg. 2013 Feb;79(2 Suppl):S19.e1-11 - PubMed
  69. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2000;142(5):539-45; discussion 545-6 - PubMed
  70. Neurosurgery. 2005 Oct;57(4 Suppl):312-8; discussion 312-8 - PubMed
  71. J Child Neurol. 2010 Mar;25(3):359-67 - PubMed
  72. World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):576-83 - PubMed
  73. World Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;80(5):500-1 - PubMed
  74. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien). 1992;54:63-8 - PubMed
  75. Surg Forum. 1951;:399-403 - PubMed
  76. Neurosurgery. 2008 Jun;62(6 Suppl 3):1029-40; discussion 1040-1 - PubMed
  77. Neurosurgery. 2007 Apr;60(4):613-8; discussion 618-20 - PubMed
  78. Neurochirurgie. 2000 Jun;46(3):286-94 - PubMed
  79. Case Rep Med. 2009;2009:434905 - PubMed
  80. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010 Jan;112(1):17-22 - PubMed
  81. Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2002 Jun;45(2):114-9 - PubMed

Publication Types