Display options
Share it on

Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2013 Dec;3(2):157-67. doi: 10.1007/s13555-013-0036-8. Epub 2013 Nov 20.

Efficacy and safety of an advanced formula silicone gel for prevention of post-operative scars.

Dermatology and therapy

Bikash Medhi, Rakesh Kumar Sewal, Lileswar Kaman, Ganesh Kadhe, Amey Mane

Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, [email protected].

PMID: 24254957 PMCID: PMC3889307 DOI: 10.1007/s13555-013-0036-8

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Scar formation is a natural part of the healing process that occurs when the skin repairs wounds caused by burns, trauma, surgery or disease. The appearance of scars often leads to adverse psychological effects, loss of self-esteem and the associated stigmatism and diminished quality of life. Silicones are emerging as the standard treatment for prevention of a wide range of scars. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an advanced formula topical silicone gel for prevention of post-operative hypertrophic and keloid scars.

METHODS: An open-label prospective trial was conducted. Patients who had undergone prior surgery (10 days-3 weeks) and having recent post-surgical scars were enrolled. Patients were asked to apply the gel twice daily to the affected areas for 3 months. Pigmentation, vascularity, pliability, height of scar and pain and pruritus in the scar were assessed. Photographs of scars were taken before commencement of treatment and at follow-up visits.

RESULTS: A total of 36 patients were enrolled. At baseline, height of the scar was 2-5 mm in 57.6 % (19/33) of the subjects which was reduced in subsequent visits (P < 0.05). Hyperpigmentation (score 3) was present in 91% (30/33) of patients at baseline and was reduced to normal (score 0) after 2 months of treatment in 40% (6/14) of patients (P = 0.0313). Vascularity (54.6%, 18/33) at baseline was also reduced over the 3 months period (P = 0.0313) A significant decrease (30%, 3/10) (P = 0.0313) in pliability was seen after 3 months of treatment from the baseline (57.6%, 19/33). Only two patients reported pruritus and pain at the baseline visit; one patient reported improvement after treatment. Itching was reported as an adverse drug reaction in two patients.

CONCLUSION: These preliminary findings suggest that advanced formula silicone gel is safe and effective in the prevention of hypertrophic and keloid scars; however, larger, controlled studies are warranted.

References

  1. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jan;107(1):272-5 - PubMed
  2. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999 Oct;104(5):1435-58 - PubMed
  3. BMJ. 2003 Jan 11;326(7380):88-92 - PubMed
  4. Arch Dermatol Res. 2006 Apr;297(10):433-8 - PubMed
  5. Burns. 2001 Aug;27(5):498-501 - PubMed
  6. Burns. 1994 Apr;20(2):163-7 - PubMed
  7. Br J Plast Surg. 1990 Nov;43(6):683-8 - PubMed
  8. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2009 Jul;2(2):104-6 - PubMed
  9. Arch Dermatol. 1993 Sep;129(9):1146-51 - PubMed
  10. Br J Plast Surg. 1992 Nov-Dec;45(8):599-603 - PubMed
  11. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):82-92 - PubMed
  12. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010 Jul;9(7):856-8 - PubMed
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008 Oct;122(4):1068-1078 - PubMed
  14. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):183-7 - PubMed
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):560-71 - PubMed
  16. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2011 Aug;19(3):551-7 - PubMed
  17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD003826 - PubMed
  18. Isr Med Assoc J. 1999 Nov;1(3):203-5 - PubMed
  19. Arch Surg. 1991 Apr;126(4):499-504 - PubMed
  20. Dermatol Surg. 2007 Nov;33(11):1291-302; discussion 1302-3 - PubMed
  21. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1982;6(3):153-8 - PubMed
  22. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2013 Jan;6(1):12-6 - PubMed
  23. Burns. 2006 Sep;32(6):678-83 - PubMed
  24. J Burn Care Rehabil. 2002 May-Jun;23(3):208-14 - PubMed
  25. Wound Repair Regen. 2002 Mar-Apr;10(2):118-21 - PubMed
  26. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Sep 15;116(4):1013-20; discussion 1021-2 - PubMed

Publication Types