Display options
Cite
Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J. 2013;7:118-22doi: 10.2174/1874210620130904003.
Dirxen, C., Blunck, U., & Preissner, S. (2013). Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. The open dentistry journal, 7118-22. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003
Dirxen, Christine, et al. "Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material." The open dentistry journal vol. 7 (2013): 118-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210620130904003
Dirxen C, Blunck U, Preissner S. Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material. Open Dent J. 2013 Sep 06;7:118-22. doi: 10.2174/1874210620130904003. eCollection 2013. PMID: 24167534; PMCID: PMC3807582.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Open Dent J. 2013 Sep 06;7:118-22. doi: 10.2174/1874210620130904003. eCollection 2013.

Clinical performance of a new biomimetic double network material.

The open dentistry journal

Christine Dirxen, Uwe Blunck, Saskia Preissner

Affiliations

  1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Assmannshauser Straße 4-6, 14197 Berlin, Germany.

PMID: 24167534 PMCID: PMC3807582 DOI: 10.2174/1874210620130904003

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of ceramics during the last years was overwhelming. However, the focus was laid on the hardness and the strength of the restorative materials, resulting in high antagonistic tooth wear. This is critical for patients with bruxism.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of the new double hybrid material for non-invasive treatment approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: The new approach of the material tested, was to modify ceramics to create a biomimetic material that has similar physical properties like dentin and enamel and is still as strong as conventional ceramics.

RESULTS: The produced crowns had a thickness ranging from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. To evaluate the clinical performance and durability of the crowns, the patient was examined half a year later. The crowns were still intact and soft tissues appeared healthy and this was achieved without any loss of tooth structure.

CONCLUSIONS: The material can be milled to thin layers, but is still strong enough to prevent cracks which are stopped by the interpenetrating polymer within the network. Depending on the clinical situation, minimally- up to non-invasive restorations can be milled.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Dentistry aims in preservation of tooth structure. Patients suffering from loss of tooth structure (dental erosion, Amelogenesis imperfecta) or even young patients could benefit from minimally-invasive crowns. Due to a Vickers hardness between dentin and enamel, antagonistic tooth wear is very low. This might be interesting for treating patients with bruxism.

Keywords: CAD/CAM; Enamic; bruxism.; dental erosion; double network hybrid material; non-invasive treatment

References

  1. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jan;97(1):25-31 - PubMed
  2. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Sep-Oct;15(5):451-6 - PubMed
  3. Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):371-8 - PubMed
  4. J Prosthet Dent. 2010 Aug;104(2):105-13 - PubMed
  5. Dent Mater. 2009 Jun;25(6):810-9 - PubMed
  6. Dent Mater. 2008 Feb;24(2):250-6 - PubMed
  7. J Dent. 2009 Dec;37(12):913-22 - PubMed
  8. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Oct;76(4):343-6 - PubMed
  9. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Apr;20:113-25 - PubMed
  10. Quintessence Int. 2008 Jul-Aug;39(7):603-9 - PubMed
  11. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2007 Feb;80(2):317-21 - PubMed
  12. J Dent. 2000 Nov;28(8):589-94 - PubMed
  13. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Jun;23(3):179-88 - PubMed
  14. J Dent Res. 1998 Mar;77(3):472-80 - PubMed
  15. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2012 Oct;24(5):310-8 - PubMed
  16. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 01;8(3):21-8 - PubMed
  17. Arch Oral Biol. 1996 Jan;41(1):9-13 - PubMed
  18. Oper Dent. 2007 May-Jun;32(3):251-60 - PubMed
  19. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):441-58 - PubMed
  20. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Jun;16(3):935-43 - PubMed
  21. Dent Mater. 2001 Jul;17(4):289-95 - PubMed
  22. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012 Jun;10:13-22 - PubMed
  23. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(2):137-45 - PubMed
  24. Dent Mater J. 2010 Mar;29(2):188-92 - PubMed
  25. Dent Mater. 2008 Dec;24(12):1676-85 - PubMed
  26. Dent Mater. 2012 May;28(5):521-8 - PubMed
  27. Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):785-91 - PubMed
  28. J Dent Res. 2008 Aug;87(8):762-6 - PubMed
  29. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):226-33 - PubMed
  30. J Dent. 2000 Sep;28(7):529-35 - PubMed
  31. Int J Prosthodont. 2002 Jul-Aug;15(4):339-46 - PubMed
  32. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Dec;76(6):619-23 - PubMed
  33. Oper Dent. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):413-20 - PubMed
  34. Dent Mater. 2008 Nov;24(11):1506-11 - PubMed
  35. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 May 1;37(5):364-76 - PubMed
  36. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006 Sep;137 Suppl:14S-21S - PubMed
  37. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Aug;98(2):120-8 - PubMed
  38. Dent Mater. 2013 Apr;29(4):419-26 - PubMed
  39. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009 Oct;91(1):71-9 - PubMed
  40. Oper Dent. 2010 May-Jun;35(3):375-9 - PubMed
  41. J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Jan;75(1):18-32 - PubMed
  42. Braz Dent J. 2012;23(1):28-35 - PubMed
  43. Quintessence Int. 2013 Apr;44(4):303-5 - PubMed
  44. Dent Mater. 2007 Jul;23(7):777-84 - PubMed
  45. Dent Mater. 2007 Sep;23(9):1129-35 - PubMed
  46. Biomaterials. 2004 Jun;25(14):2885-92 - PubMed
  47. Arch Oral Biol. 2002 Apr;47(4):281-91 - PubMed
  48. Dent Mater. 2004 Jun;20(5):449-56 - PubMed
  49. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2006 Mar 01;11(2):E215-20 - PubMed
  50. J Endod. 2009 Oct;35(10):1391-5 - PubMed
  51. J Oral Rehabil. 2012 Jan;39(1):73-9 - PubMed
  52. Quintessence Int. 1994 Mar;25(3):199-207 - PubMed
  53. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Jun 7;9(71):1265-74 - PubMed
  54. Oper Dent. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):432-41 - PubMed

Publication Types