Display options
Share it on

Theor Appl Genet. 1983 Nov;67(1):35-43. doi: 10.1007/BF00303919.

Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs.

TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik

J S Beckmann, M Soller

Affiliations

  1. Agricultural Research Organization, Institute of Field and Garden Crops, The Volcani Center, 50250, Bet Dagan, Israel.

PMID: 24258478 DOI: 10.1007/BF00303919

Abstract

Recently a new class of genetic polymorphism, restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), has been uncovered by the use of restriction endonucleases which cleave DNA molecules at specific sites and cloned DNA probes which detect specific homologous DNA fragments. RFLPs promise to be exceedingly numerous and are expected to have genetic characteristics - lack of dominance, multiple allelic forms and absence of pleiotropic effects on economic traits - of particular usefulness in breeding programs. The nature of RFLPs and the methodologies involved in their detection are described and estimated costs per polymorphism determination are derived. The anticipated costs of applying RFLPs to genome mapping are considered in terms of the number of RFLPs required for a given degree of genome coverage, the number of probe × enzyme combinations tested per polymorphism uncovered, and the total number of individuals and polymorphisms scored for mapping purposes. The anticipated costs of applying RFLPs to genetic improvement are considered in terms of the number of individuals and the number of polymorphisms per individual that are scored for the various applications. Applications considered include: varietal identification, identification and mapping of quantitative trait loci, screening genetic resource strains for useful quantitative trait alleles and their marker-assisted introgression from resource strain to commercial variety, and marker-assited early selection of recombinant inbred lines in plant pedigree breeding programs and of young sires in dairy cattle improvement programs. In most cases anticipated costs appear to be commensurate with the scientific or economic value of the application.

References

  1. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314-31 - PubMed
  2. Evolution. 1979 Sep;33(3):815-833 - PubMed
  3. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):371-80 - PubMed
  4. J Mol Biol. 1977 Jun 15;113(1):237-51 - PubMed
  5. Methods Enzymol. 1979;68:176-82 - PubMed
  6. Theor Appl Genet. 1975 Jan;46(7):319-30 - PubMed
  7. Lancet. 1979 Apr 28;1(8122):923 - PubMed
  8. Theor Appl Genet. 1983 Nov;67(1):25-33 - PubMed
  9. J Mol Biol. 1975 Nov 5;98(3):503-17 - PubMed
  10. Cell. 1979 Sep;18(1):1-10 - PubMed
  11. Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1980;11(3):127-50 - PubMed
  12. Anal Biochem. 1981 Jun;114(1):193-7 - PubMed
  13. Theor Appl Genet. 1981 Sep;60(5):291-6 - PubMed
  14. Am J Hum Genet. 1982 Nov;34(6):842-5 - PubMed
  15. Methods Enzymol. 1980;65(1):404-11 - PubMed
  16. Theor Appl Genet. 1976 Jan;47(1):35-9 - PubMed
  17. Theor Appl Genet. 1977 May;51(3):133-7 - PubMed
  18. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1975;39 Pt 1:439-46 - PubMed
  19. Methods Enzymol. 1979;68:220-42 - PubMed
  20. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 Nov;77(11):6754-8 - PubMed
  21. Anim Blood Groups Biochem Genet. 1980;11(4):261-9 - PubMed

Publication Types