BMJ Open. 2013 Nov 25;3(11):e003461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003461.

Attitudes towards smoking restrictions and tobacco advertisement bans in Georgia.

BMJ open

George D Bakhturidze, Maurice B Mittelmark, Leif E Aarø, Nana T Peikrishvili

PMID: 24282242 PMCID: PMC3845040 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003461

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to provide data on a public level of support for restricting smoking in public places and banning tobacco advertisements.

DESIGN: A nationally representative multistage sampling design, with sampling strata defined by region (sampling quotas proportional to size) and substrata defined by urban/rural and mountainous/lowland settlement, within which census enumeration districts were randomly sampled, within which households were randomly sampled, within which a randomly selected respondent was interviewed.

SETTING: The country of Georgia, population 4.7 million, located in the Caucasus region of Eurasia.

PARTICIPANTS: One household member aged between 13 and 70 was selected as interviewee. In households with more than one age-eligible person, selection was carried out at random. Of 1588 persons selected, 14 refused to participate and interviews were conducted with 915 women and 659 men.

OUTCOME MEASURES: Respondents were interviewed about their level of agreement with eight possible smoking restrictions/bans, used to calculate a single dichotomous (agree/do not agree) opinion indicator. The level of agreement with restrictions was analysed in bivariate and multivariate analyses by age, gender, education, income and tobacco use status.

RESULTS: Overall, 84.9% of respondents indicated support for smoking restrictions and tobacco advertisement bans. In all demographic segments, including tobacco users, the majority of respondents indicated agreement with restrictions, ranging from a low of 51% in the 13-25 age group to a high of 98% in the 56-70 age group. Logistic regression with all demographic variables entered showed that agreement with restrictions was higher with age, and was significantly higher among never smokers as compared to daily smokers.

CONCLUSIONS: Georgian public opinion is normatively supportive of more stringent tobacco-control measures in the form of smoking restrictions and tobacco advertisement bans.

Keywords: MEDICAL LAW; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH

References

1. Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19(2):117-24 - PubMed
2. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2007 Nov-Dec;13(6):621-9 - PubMed
3. Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12(3):251-6 - PubMed
4. Am J Public Health. 2002 Jun;92(6):941-3 - PubMed
5. Tob Control. 1998 Autumn;7(3):241-6 - PubMed
6. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(7):902-10 - PubMed
7. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2008 Jan 25;57(1):1-28 - PubMed
8. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2002 Dec;26(6):536-42 - PubMed
9. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Jun;5(3):303-14 - PubMed
10. Tob Control. 2006 Jun;15 Suppl 3:iii34-41 - PubMed
11. Tob Control. 2002 Sep;11(3):195-200 - PubMed
12. Am J Public Health. 1987 May;77(5):612-4 - PubMed
13. Tob Control. 2008 Aug;17(4):276-83 - PubMed
14. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1986 Fall;11(3):393-422 - PubMed
15. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Oct;32(5):482-8 - PubMed
16. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun;117(6):e1237-48 - PubMed
17. Prev Med. 2010 Aug;51(2):193-4 - PubMed
18. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2012 Mar;20(1):75-80 - PubMed
19. Am J Public Health. 2004 Dec;94(12):2177-87 - PubMed
20. Can J Public Health. 2003 Jan-Feb;94(1):36-40 - PubMed
21. Tob Control. 2013 Nov;22(6):e12 - PubMed
22. Am J Public Health. 2004 Jul;94(7):1230-8 - PubMed
23. S Afr Med J. 1996 Nov;86(11):1389-93 - PubMed
24. Int J Public Health. 2009;54(6):403-8 - PubMed
25. J Health Econ. 2000 Nov;19(6):1117-37 - PubMed
26. Prev Med. 1997 Jan-Feb;26(1):138-43 - PubMed
27. Am J Public Health. 2001 Feb;91(2):300-3 - PubMed
28. Health Promot Pract. 2004 Jul;5(3 Suppl):35S-45S - PubMed
29. Eur J Public Health. 2008 Oct;18(5):484-90 - PubMed

Publication Types

• Journal Article