Display options
Share it on

Fish Physiol Biochem. 1995 Apr;14(2):111-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00002455.

Ammonia and urea excretion in the tidepool sculpin (Oligocottus maculosus): sites of excretion, effects of reduced salinity and mechanisms of urea transport.

Fish physiology and biochemistry

P A Wright, P Part, C M Wood

Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1.

PMID: 24197359 DOI: 10.1007/BF00002455

Abstract

Tidepool sculpins live in a variable environment where water temperature, salinity, gas tensions, and pH can change considerably with the daily tide cycle. Tidepool sculpins are primarily ammoniotelic, with 8-17% of nitrogen wastes excreted as urea. The majority of net ammonia (J(net) amm; 85%) and urea (J(net) urea; 74%) excretion occurred across the gill, with the remainder excreted across the skin, the kidney, and/or gut. Acute (2h) exposure to 50% seawater significantly increased J(net) urea (2.8-fold), but reduced J(net) amm (3.5-fold). In fish exposed to 50% seawater for 1 week, J(net) urea returned to control values, but J(net) amm remained slightly depressed. Unidirectional urea influx (J(in) urea) and efflux (J(out) urea) were measured using(14)C-urea to determine if urea was excreted across the gills by simple diffusion or by a carrier-mediated mechanism. J(in) urea increased in a linear manner with increasing urea water levels (0-11 mmol N l(-1)), while J(out) urea was independent of external urea concentrations. As well, J(net) urea and J(out inurea) were not significantly different from one another, indicating the absence of "back transport". Urea analogs and transport inhibitors added to the water did not have any consistent effect on unidirectional urea flux. These results demonstrate that ammonia and urea excretion rates and sites of excretion in tidepool sculpins are very similar to those found in other marine and freshwater teleosts. Urea and ammonia may play a role in osmoregulation as excretion rates and tissue levels were influenced by changes in water salinity. Finally, we found no evidence for a specific urea carrier; branchial urea excretion is likely dependent on simple diffusion.

References

  1. Am J Physiol. 1989 May;256(5 Pt 2):F830-5 - PubMed
  2. Clin Chim Acta. 1980 Oct 23;107(1-2):3-9 - PubMed
  3. J Exp Zool. 1977 Mar;199(3):309-16 - PubMed
  4. Am J Physiol. 1976 Apr;230(4):925-31 - PubMed
  5. Am J Physiol. 1989 Sep;257(3 Pt 2):F359-65 - PubMed
  6. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1974 Apr 1;47(4):1241-4 - PubMed
  7. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Feb;81(2):221-37 - PubMed
  8. Comp Biochem Physiol. 1968 Aug;26(2):455-66 - PubMed
  9. Science. 1964 Dec 18;146(3651):1587-8 - PubMed
  10. Pflugers Arch. 1993 Apr;423(1-2):51-8 - PubMed
  11. J Exp Biol. 1994 Jun;191(1):195-206 - PubMed
  12. Am J Physiol. 1991 Oct;261(4 Pt 2):R898-906 - PubMed
  13. Pflugers Arch. 1981 Jun;390(3):299-300 - PubMed
  14. Science. 1989 Jan 6;243(4887):72-5 - PubMed
  15. Am J Physiol. 1973 Feb;224(2):367-72 - PubMed
  16. J Clin Invest. 1973 Jun;52(6):1435-42 - PubMed
  17. J Physiol. 1982 May;326:297-307 - PubMed
  18. Am J Physiol. 1971 Mar;220(3):742-6 - PubMed
  19. Respir Physiol. 1988 Mar;71(3):355-73 - PubMed
  20. J Gen Physiol. 1983 Jul;82(1):1-23 - PubMed
  21. Am J Physiol. 1974 Jun;226(6):1327-32 - PubMed
  22. Am J Physiol. 1968 Dec;215(6):1493-7 - PubMed
  23. Pflugers Arch. 1976 Mar 30;362(2):109-12 - PubMed

Publication Types