Display options
Cite
Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, et al. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):171-6
Abbaszadegan, A., Nabavizadeh, M., Hoseini Yekani, A., & Khayat, A. (2013). Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iranian endodontic journal, 8(4), 171-6.
Abbaszadegan, Abbas, et al. "Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study." Iranian endodontic journal vol. 8,4 (2013): 171-6.
Abbaszadegan A, Nabavizadeh M, Hoseini Yekani A, Khayat A. Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study. Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 07. PMID: 24171024; PMCID: PMC3808676.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):171-6. Epub 2013 Oct 07.

Comparison of Endodontic Treatment Results Yielded from Using Normal Saline with IKI Final Rinse or NaOCl Irrigation: A 30-Month Follow-up Study.

Iranian endodontic journal

Abbas Abbaszadegan, Mohammadreza Nabavizadeh, Ameneh Hoseini Yekani, Akbar Khayat

Affiliations

  1. Department of Endodontics, Dental School, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, IR Iran.

PMID: 24171024 PMCID: PMC3808676

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate and compare the endodontic treatment results of teeth with apical periodontitis after thirty-month recall with two different irrigation regimen: normal saline followed by Iodine Potassium Iodide (IKI) or sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) irrigation alone.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty seven patients (30 teeth) who had been included in the first part of our antimicrobial survey were recalled. In previous stage, root canal treatments were performed using either normal saline with IKI final rinse (n = 15) or NaOCl (n = 15) as irrigating solutions. Bacterial samples were taken before and after instrumentation. In this stage, three patients (6 teeth) were excluded from the follow-up schedule since they did not respond to the recall requests. The remaining 24 subjects (12 teeth in each NaOCl and IKI group) were examined clinically and radiologically. Post-operative and follow-up images were coded, blindly evaluated and given a periapical score according to PAI scoring system. The outcome was assessed in two ways; first, the changes in PAI score from base line to the follow-up evaluation in each group were assessed by wilcoxon signed rank test. In addition, Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the differences between the post-operative and follow-up images of treatment groups. Second, the dichotomous variables as "healed" or "not healed" were compared.

RESULTS: The Median (Min, Max) PAI scores for NaOCl group and IKI group were both 5 (3, 5) for immediate post-operative radiographs and declined to 1 (1, 2) and 2 (1, 2), respectively. A statistically significant decrease in PAI score from the base line to the follow-up evaluation was seen in both groups (P = 0.002). The decrease in NaOCl group was higher significantly in comparison to IKI group (P = 0.036). One hundred percent of the teeth were healed in both groups (PAI ≤ 2) and no teeth showed any abnormal clinical findings.

CONCLUSION: Root canal irrigation with NaOCl resulted in a significant higher decrease in PAI scores in comparison to irrigation with normal saline followed by IKI final rinse. Although, according to results of 30-months recall, complete bone formation was observed in all samples in both groups and no teeth showed any abnormal clinical findings. These findings depict the weight of all important clinical and biological factors which together impact the results of a successful endodontic treatment.

Keywords: Apical Periodontitis; Healing; Iodine Potassium Iodide; Sodium Hypochlorite

References

  1. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001 Nov;67(10):582-5 - PubMed
  2. Int Endod J. 1987 Mar;20(2):75-81 - PubMed
  3. Int Dent J. 1991 Feb;41(1):33-42 - PubMed
  4. Int Endod J. 2000 May;33(3):219-26 - PubMed
  5. Int Endod J. 1996 May;29(3):150-5 - PubMed
  6. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1999 Oct;15(5):205-9 - PubMed
  7. J Endod. 2009 Sep;35(9):1182-5 - PubMed
  8. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005 Jan;99(1):119-24 - PubMed
  9. Int Endod J. 1998 Jul;31(4):290-4 - PubMed
  10. Iran Endod J. 2010 Summer;5(3):101-6 - PubMed
  11. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 May 25;2:26 - PubMed
  12. Int Endod J. 2002 Aug;35(8):660-7 - PubMed
  13. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1982 May;53(5):503-7 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2004 Sep;30(9):627-33 - PubMed
  15. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):258-63 - PubMed
  16. Int Endod J. 2003 Apr;36(4):296-301 - PubMed
  17. J Endod. 2004 Aug;30(8):572-6 - PubMed
  18. J Endod. 2007 Oct;33(10):1145-8 - PubMed
  19. J Endod. 2005 Aug;31(8):613-5 - PubMed
  20. Aust Endod J. 2012 Aug;38(2):60-3 - PubMed
  21. Int Endod J. 2002 Sep;35(9):784-90 - PubMed
  22. Int Endod J. 1997 Sep;30(5):297-306 - PubMed
  23. J Endod. 1979 Mar;5(3):83-90 - PubMed
  24. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):429-34 - PubMed
  25. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2000 Jun;15(3):139-50 - PubMed
  26. Int Endod J. 2007 Oct;40(10):786-93 - PubMed
  27. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987 Apr;3(2):58-63 - PubMed
  28. J Endod. 2012 Sep;38(9):1164-9 - PubMed
  29. Int Endod J. 1982 Jan;15(1):16-22 - PubMed
  30. J Endod. 1990 Sep;16(9):411-7 - PubMed
  31. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):251-7 - PubMed
  32. J Endod. 2005 Dec;31(12):863-6 - PubMed
  33. J Adhes Dent. 2004 Autumn;6(3):175-82 - PubMed
  34. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1987 Aug;3(4):178-86 - PubMed
  35. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74 - PubMed
  36. Int Endod J. 2004 Jan;37(1):12-8 - PubMed
  37. Int Endod J. 2003 Feb;36(2):75-85 - PubMed
  38. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2010;23(3):244-7 - PubMed
  39. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 Dec;7(6):246-50 - PubMed

Publication Types