Display options
Share it on

Iran Endod J. 2013;8(4):182-6. Epub 2013 Oct 07.

Evaluation of marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials using scanning electron microscopy.

Iranian endodontic journal

Helder Fernandes Oliveira, Ana Helena Gonçalves Alencar, José Antônio Poli Figueiredo, Orlando Aguirre Guedes, Daniel de Almeida Decurcio, Carlos Estrela

Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Goias, Goiânia, Brazil.

PMID: 24171026 PMCID: PMC3808678

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The importance of perfect apical seal in endodontics, more specifically in periradicular surgery, is the motivation/reason for development of root-end filling materials with favorable physical, chemical and biological characteristics. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal adaptation of root-end filling materials using scanning electron microscopy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty five human maxillary anterior teeth were prepared using a K-File #50 to 1 mm short of the apical foramen and filled with gutta-percha and Sealapex using the lateral compaction technique. The apical 3 mm of the roots were sectioned perpendicularly to the long axis of the teeth. A 3-mm-deep root-end cavity was prepared using ultrasonic tips powered by an Enac ultrasonic unit. The teeth were randomly assigned to five groups according to the materials tested including IRM, amalgam, ProRoot MTA, Super-EBA and Epiphany/Resilon. Root-end cavities were filled with the materials prepared according to the manufacturers' instructions. The root apices were carefully prepared for sputter coating and later evaluation using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The images of root-end fillings were divided into four quadrants and distributed into five categories according to the level of marginal adaptation between the root-end material and the root canal walls. The Fisher exact test with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was set at P = 0.005.

RESULTS: SEM images showed the presence of gaps in the root-end filling materials. No significant difference was observed between the tested materials (P > 0.005).

CONCLUSION: ProRoot MTA, IRM, amalgam, Super-EBA and Epiphany/Resilon showed similar marginal adaptation as root-end filling materials.

Keywords: MTA; Marginal Adaptation; Root Canal Filling Materials; Scanning Electron Microscopy

References

  1. J Endod. 2006 Jul;32(7):601-23 - PubMed
  2. J Endod. 1993 Nov;19(11):541-4 - PubMed
  3. J Endod. 1995 Nov;21(11):569-71 - PubMed
  4. J Endod. 2004 May;30(5):342-7 - PubMed
  5. J Endod. 1994 Apr;20(4):159-63 - PubMed
  6. J Endod. 1999 Mar;25(3):161-6 - PubMed
  7. J Endod. 1993 Dec;19(12):591-5 - PubMed
  8. J Endod. 1995 Dec;21(12):603-8 - PubMed
  9. J Endod. 1995 Jun;21(6):295-9 - PubMed
  10. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011 May 01;16(3):e418-24 - PubMed
  11. Braz Dent J. 2001;12(1):3-8 - PubMed
  12. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Apr;95(4):483-9 - PubMed
  13. Iran Endod J. 2008 Fall;3(4):129-33 - PubMed
  14. J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):539-42 - PubMed
  15. Iran Endod J. 2009 Summer;4(3):106-11 - PubMed
  16. Int Endod J. 2002 Jan;35(1):22-9 - PubMed
  17. J Conserv Dent. 2008 Oct;11(4):141-3 - PubMed
  18. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004 Nov 01;15(6):348-81 - PubMed
  19. J Endod. 1995 Aug;21(8):403-6 - PubMed
  20. J Endod. 2008 Mar;34(3):273-9 - PubMed
  21. Braz Dent J. 2005;16(2):149-55 - PubMed
  22. Braz Dent J. 2000;11(1):3-9 - PubMed
  23. J Endod. 1998 Aug;24(8):557-60 - PubMed
  24. J Endod. 2006 Apr;32(4):324-7 - PubMed
  25. Gen Dent. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):368-73 - PubMed
  26. J Endod. 1995 Jul;21(7):349-53 - PubMed
  27. J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):514-9 - PubMed
  28. Braz Dent J. 2002;13(1):23-6 - PubMed
  29. Iran Endod J. 2012 Summer;7(3):134-8 - PubMed

Publication Types