Display options
Share it on

Open Access J Urol. 2009 Aug 24;1:9-13. doi: 10.2147/rru.s6580. eCollection 2009.

Differences in quantitative urine composition in stone-forming versus unaffected mate kidneys.

Open access journal of urology

Michael L Eisenberg, Keith L Lee, Benjamin N Breyer, Thomas J Walsh, Badrinath R Konety, Marshall L Stoller

Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA;

PMID: 24198607 PMCID: PMC3806393 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s6580

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many patients present with bilateral stones. There is a unique group of patients, however, that presents with stones exclusively on one side. We hypothesize that in such situations, 24-hour urine collections may not reveal specific defects on the affected stone-bearing kidney. We therefore evaluated selective 12-hour urine collections after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) to help determine if there is differential renal excretion.

METHODS: We collected urine specimens from patients with nephrolithiasis who underwent unilateral PNL. Urine samples were collected and analyzed from nephrostomy tubes, representing the affected kidneys, and from Foley bladder catheters, representing the contralateral mate kidney.

RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were studied (14 with unilateral nephrolithiasis and 17 with bilateral). Treated kidneys from patients with unilateral nephrolithiasis displayed lowered urine excretion of uric acid, sodium, chloride, calcium, and total osmoles when compared to patients with bilateral nephrolithiasis. Stone size and length of procedure were not predictive of urine composition after PNL.

CONCLUSIONS: Treated kidneys from patients with a history of unilateral stone disease revealed marked differences in urine excretion compared to those with bilateral nephrolithiasis after unilateral PNL. These findings could be secondary to the surgical insult, urinary stone disease, or could be a responsible factor for stone pathogenesis.

Keywords: kidney; nephrolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; stone

References

  1. Urol Res. 2005 Nov;33(5):383-9 - PubMed
  2. J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):664-8 - PubMed
  3. J Urol. 1982 May;127(5):855-8 - PubMed
  4. J Urol. 1984 Oct;132(4):743-5 - PubMed
  5. Kidney Int. 2001 Jun;59(6):2290-8 - PubMed
  6. J Urol. 2001 Apr;165(4):1085-7 - PubMed
  7. J Urol. 1994 Dec;152(6 Pt 1):1977-81 - PubMed
  8. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):848-57 - PubMed
  9. Crit Care Med. 2004 Oct;32(10):2039-44 - PubMed
  10. Lancet. 2006 Jan 28;367(9507):333-44 - PubMed
  11. J Urol. 1999 Jul;162(1):27-30 - PubMed
  12. Arch Intern Med. 1982 Mar;142(3):504-7 - PubMed
  13. Urology. 2003 Sep;62(3):421-4 - PubMed
  14. J Endourol. 2006 Dec;20(12):1030-40 - PubMed
  15. J Urol. 1976 Jul;116(1):11-4 - PubMed

Publication Types