Display options
Cite
Gibson L, Strong J. The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 1996;6(3):159-75doi: 10.1007/BF02110753.
Gibson, L., & Strong, J. (1996). The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain. Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 6(3), 159-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110753
Gibson, L, and Strong, J. "The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain." Journal of occupational rehabilitation vol. 6,3 (1996): 159-75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02110753
Gibson L, Strong J. The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 1996 Sep;6(3):159-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02110753. PMID: 24234977.
Copy Download .nbib Format: NLM
Share it on

J Occup Rehabil. 1996 Sep;6(3):159-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02110753.

The reliability and validity of a measure of perceived functional capacity for work in chronic back pain.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation

L Gibson, J Strong

Affiliations

  1. Commonwealth Rehabilitation Service, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

PMID: 24234977 DOI: 10.1007/BF02110753

Abstract

Psychosocial factors, including perceived disability and self-efficacy, are important determinants of outcome for individuals with chronic back pain. Consequently, there is a need for an evaluation and consideration of such factors in occupational rehabilitation. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of a tool, the Spinal Function Sort, as a measure of perceived capacity for work-related tasks with 42 rehabilitation clients with chronic back pain. Results provided support for the internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.97), test-rest reliability (ICC of 0.89) and construct validity of the Spinal Function Sort as a measure of perceived capacity for work-related tasks in persons with chronic back pain. Measures of similar constructs were significantly correlated with the Spinal Function Sort and were highly predictive of the Spinal Function Sort on multiple regression. Relationships between perceived work capacity and pain intensity and gender are discussed. The need for the consideration of perceived capacity in the evaluation and rehabilitation of persons with chronic back pain is highlighted.

References

  1. Med Care. 1981 Aug;19(8):787-805 - PubMed
  2. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):2032S-2036S - PubMed
  3. Pain. 1992 Mar;48(3):339-347 - PubMed
  4. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18(1):29-33 - PubMed
  5. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Jun;(279):101-9 - PubMed
  6. Pain. 1991 Mar;44(3):263-269 - PubMed
  7. J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Jun;2(2):53-66 - PubMed
  8. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jun;17(6):629-40 - PubMed
  9. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Jun;1(2):159-79 - PubMed
  10. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Sep;12(7):632-44 - PubMed
  11. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):605-7 - PubMed
  12. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Apr 15;19(8):872-80 - PubMed
  13. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988 Dec;69(12):1044-53 - PubMed
  14. Clin J Pain. 1993 Mar;9(1):3-15 - PubMed
  15. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215 - PubMed
  16. J Occup Rehabil. 1995 Jun;5(2):87-99 - PubMed
  17. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Oct;76(10):966-73 - PubMed
  18. Clin J Pain. 1994 Sep;10(3):197-203 - PubMed
  19. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):212-20 - PubMed
  20. Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Jan;47(1):10-6 - PubMed
  21. Behav Res Ther. 1990;28(2):165-9 - PubMed
  22. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Dec;1(4):289-302 - PubMed
  23. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Jun;1(2):113-31 - PubMed
  24. Br J Rheumatol. 1995 Oct;34(10):951-5 - PubMed
  25. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987 Jul;68(7):438-41 - PubMed
  26. Pain. 1995 Oct;63(1):77-83 - PubMed
  27. Clin J Pain. 1993 Sep;9(3):189-95 - PubMed
  28. J Occup Rehabil. 1992 Jun;2(2):73-88 - PubMed
  29. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3 - PubMed
  30. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 May;16(5):542-8 - PubMed
  31. J Occup Rehabil. 1994 Dec;4(4):229-51 - PubMed
  32. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Mar 15;20(6):722-8 - PubMed
  33. Pain. 1986 Mar;24(3):365-372 - PubMed
  34. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Sep 1;20(17):1943-9 - PubMed
  35. Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Sep;48(9):783-90 - PubMed
  36. Clin J Pain. 1994 Sep;10(3):191-6 - PubMed
  37. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Sep;16(9):1039-43 - PubMed
  38. Control Clin Trials. 1991 Aug;12(4 Suppl):142S-158S - PubMed
  39. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Mar;1(1):5-12 - PubMed
  40. J Occup Rehabil. 1993 Mar;3(1):15-30 - PubMed
  41. Pain. 1994 Apr;57(1):69-76 - PubMed
  42. Clin J Pain. 1991 Sep;7(3):209-18 - PubMed
  43. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Aug;70(8):589-93 - PubMed
  44. Pain. 1988 Jun;33(3):323-331 - PubMed
  45. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Jun;1(2):95-104 - PubMed
  46. Pain. 1990 Feb;40(2):171-182 - PubMed
  47. Aust J Physiother. 1993;39(3):203-10 - PubMed
  48. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1991;23(2):73-82 - PubMed
  49. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Mar;13(3):351-3 - PubMed
  50. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Apr;11(3):277-81 - PubMed
  51. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Sep;1(3):185-95 - PubMed
  52. Pain. 1989 Oct;39(1):55-67 - PubMed
  53. Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(3):313-9 - PubMed
  54. J Occup Rehabil. 1991 Sep;1(3):235-43 - PubMed
  55. Pain. 1995 Sep;62(3):363-372 - PubMed
  56. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989 Apr;70(4):303-7 - PubMed
  57. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Apr 15;19(8):941-7 - PubMed
  58. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 Apr;71(2):92-6 - PubMed
  59. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1984 Nov;(190):115-23 - PubMed

Publication Types