Display options
Share it on

Balkan J Med Genet. 2013 Jun;16(1):13-20. doi: 10.2478/bjmg-2013-0013.

Human Ring Chromosomes - New Insights for their Clinical Significance.

Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG

Rs Guilherme, E Klein, Ab Hamid, S Bhatt, M Volleth, A Polityko, A Kulpanovich, A Dufke, B Albrecht, S Morlot, L Brecevic, Mb Petersen, E Manolakos, N Kosyakova, T Liehr

Affiliations

  1. Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, D-07743 Jena, Germany ; Department of Morphology and Genetics, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, 04023-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

PMID: 24265580 PMCID: PMC3835292 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2013-0013

Abstract

Twenty-nine as yet unreported ring chromosomes were characterized in detail by cytogenetic and molecular techniques. For FISH (fluorescence in situ hybridization) previously published high resolution approaches such as multicolor banding (MCB), subcentromere-specific multi-color-FISH (cenM-FISH) and two to three-color-FISH applying locus-specific probes were used. Overall, ring chromosome derived from chromosomes 4 (one case), 10 (one case), 13 (five cases), 14, (three cases), 18 (two cases), 21 (eight cases), 22 (three cases), X (five cases) and Y (one case) were studied. Eight cases were detected prenatally, eight due developmental delay and dysmorphic signs, and nine in connection with infertility and/or Turner syndrome. In general, this report together with data from the literature, supports the idea that ring chromosome patients fall into two groups: group one with (severe) clinical signs and symptoms due to the ring chromosome and group two with no obvious clinical problems apart from infertility.

Keywords: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH); Genotype-phenotype correlations; Ring chromosomes

References

  1. BMC Med Genet. 2011 Dec 21;12:171 - PubMed
  2. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2006;112(1-2):23-34 - PubMed
  3. Sex Dev. 2007;1(6):353-62 - PubMed
  4. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2003;103(1-2):28-33 - PubMed
  5. Genet Couns. 2011;22(3):321-6 - PubMed
  6. J Histochem Cytochem. 2008 May;56(5):487-93 - PubMed
  7. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Mar;47(2):201-10 - PubMed
  8. Hum Genet. 1982;61(1):18-23 - PubMed
  9. Epileptic Disord. 2010 Sep;12(3):222-7 - PubMed
  10. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004;107(1-2):55-67 - PubMed
  11. Mol Cytogenet. 2009 Dec 07;2:25 - PubMed
  12. Hum Genet. 1987 Feb;75(2):174-9 - PubMed
  13. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2002;97(1-2):43-50 - PubMed
  14. J Med Genet. 1998 Nov;35(11):932-8 - PubMed
  15. J Histochem Cytochem. 2007 Nov;55(11):1123-8 - PubMed
  16. Ann Genet. 1981;24(4):231-5 - PubMed
  17. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011 Oct;23(4):466-70 - PubMed
  18. J Pediatr Surg. 2008 Nov;43(11):e17-20 - PubMed
  19. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Mar;51(1):71-6 - PubMed
  20. Am J Med Genet. 2001 Jul 1;101(3):226-39 - PubMed
  21. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Dec;149A(12):2782-7 - PubMed
  22. Am J Hum Genet. 2008 Feb;82(2):398-410 - PubMed
  23. Am J Med Genet. 1995 Apr 10;56(3):308-11 - PubMed
  24. Int J Mol Med. 2002 Apr;9(4):335-9 - PubMed

Publication Types